Melbourne: At least three other participants in the Australian Open with the same medical release as Novak Djokovic already exists in this country with more potential to arrive for the next week, a source told Reuters on Friday.
Djokovic spent Orthodox Christmas in detention on Friday after the visa was canceled on arrival in Australia when officials ruled the documentation was not enough to allow him to enter the country when he was not vaccinated.
Political Fallout, both at home and abroad, intensively overnight as the Djokovic legal team prepared documents aimed at expanding their stay after federal court listeners on Monday.
Novak Djokovic (AP photo) Grand Slam Winner 20 times may not be the only person who hopes to take part in the Australian Open to face the removal of the country.
Minister of Home Affairs Karen Andrews has confirmed the Australian border force assesses the other two credentials who enter the country with the same exemption given to Djokovic.
Read Alsonovak Djokovic in Limbo as the Australian Battle lawyer Banworld Player Tennis Novak Djokovic was rejected entered Australia on Thursday after the protest storm about the decision to give him medical liberation to play in Australia opened.
Tennis star remained in Australia after his lawyer launched the source source with this issue to the issue to Reuters that the third participant in the Grand Slam also entered Australia in the same framework, which had been imposed by Australian tennis and the state government of Victoria.
Exceptions may also have been given to players or officials who have not arrived in Australia, added the source.
While the tournament starts on January 17, the ITF Junior Events and wheelchair tournaments will begin next week, as well as the qualifying event for the Australian Open.
TA has not commented on this problem since Djokovic was originally detained at Melbourne Airport shortly after 11 nights.
on Wednesday.
Read Alsowhat really stumbled Novak Djokovic on the Australian border? Superstar tennis Novak Djokovic Australia’s visa disaster can go down to subtle but important differences in the rules of Covid-19 vaccination to play in Australia open or enter the country.
Director of Craig Tiley, who is also the Chief Executive TA, defended the medical exception given to Djokovic before his detention.
Srdjan Djokovic, the father of the player who was detained, had claimed more than 20 exceptions distributed to tennis participants before the Australian boundary intervention.
AP Phototiley said this week 26 claims for exceptions had been submitted, but only “a handful” approved.
The Djokovic Law Team from Nick Wood and Paul Holdenson is expected to submit further documents on Saturday that supports Australia’s open Champion offer nine times for the command to postpone his departure.
Justin Quill, a partner with Thomson Geer who specializes in media law, said Djokovic might be able to play Australia Open even while the challenge for the decision of deportation.
He said if the interim command Djokovic succeeded, the trial of this problem would likely be listed for a date that fell well after completion of the tournament on January 30.
“When you see the interlokutory command, you must delete two things.” Quill told Reuters.
“You have to show any cases that can be debated on reasonable reasons.
If Djokovic stops the first hurdle, the next thing is the balance of comfort.” This is where you balance the scales in connection with the imposition of each party and who will be blocked more if their rights are wrongly rejected.
“Say he believes the balance of comfort can support Djokovic.” If it turns out the Minister of Home Affairs is right and he finally won the case, they could deport Djokovic.
It doesn’t really have an impact on the minister too much, “said Quill.” If it turns out Novak is right and that they have never had the right to deport him, he can’t get back the opportunity in 2022 of the Australian Open.
He could not regain his efforts to go down as the biggest grand slam that had ever had a winner in history.
“