New Delhi: Three TMC Parliamentarians on Friday Writing to PM Looking for the Elimination of Public Lawyers Tushar Mehta, who represented the CBI in Fund Fraud in Saradha and Saradha Chit funds in the Constitutional Court, for allegedly conducting unhappiness by meeting BJP leaders, a defendant of two fraud.
Derek O’Brien, Sukhendu Sekhar Roy and Mahua Moitra accused Adhikari to meet Mehta on Thursday immediately after meeting Interior Minister Amit Shah and that the meeting emerged “organized to influence the results of Adhikari” by using office SG.
However, SG rejected allegations of irregularity, confirmed that he had never met Adhikari.
Responding to TI’s request, he wrote, “Adhikari did come to my cum-cum-office office without notice on Thursday around 3pm.
Because I was in a pre-schedule meeting in my room, my staff asked him to sit in the waiting room and offered him a cup of tea.
When my meeting was excessive and my PPS told me about Adhikari’s arrival, I asked my PPS to tell Adhikari my inability to meet him and apologize for my name because he had to wait.
Adhikari thanked the PPS and Go without insisting on meeting me.
My meeting question with Adhikari because it did not appear.
“Members of Parliament said” Meeting with Adhikari not only imagined unhappiness but also raised integrity questions and polluted SG posts “.
They said such meetings between the defendants and the most senior Indian law officers in India, who advised the agent of an investigation by him Adhikari was being investigated, was in direct conflict with the task of the SG Law.
SG has been in the TMC thimble line since he, appears for the CBI, accusing in Calcutta HC and SC that CM Mamata Banerjee has led the crowd of TMC workers to the CBI office on May 17 to prevent institutions that produce physically captured TMC leaders in Narada Scam before Court court.
He also alleged that the Minister of Law Moloy Ghatak had packed the court of trial with TMC supporters to flood the trial judge, who had provided guarantees to TMC leaders.
HC was confiscated from the CBI petition in this matter.
As long as SC has recently heard the petition by Mamata and Ghatak challenges HC’s refusal to receive delays in their “delayed” responses in Narada’s case, SG has said that SC can allow the duo to make fresh applications for written receipts before HC because it’s not a case at where CBI must oppose their request in SC.
SC bench has called the “very fair” SG holder.