Lucknow: Removing a frontal attack on the opposition, Chairman of the Yogi Adityanath Minister on Wednesday said the previous government at Uttar Pradesh had never had poor people, women, farmers or adolescents on their agenda and this was supported by difficult statistics.
Only 53lakh houses can be given to those in need in the last 30 years, said Yogi, while distributing keys up to 5.41 recipients of Lakh PM Beware of Yojana (CMAY).
In contrast, the BJP government, he said, provided 41.73 lakh in rural and urban areas in four years, which was a record.
“Only after PM Narendra Modi took power over 2014 that poor people were associated with various government schemes without caste, region or religious discrimination,” Yogi said, who also interacted with beneficiaries of Ayodhya, Bahraich, Rae Bareli, Bahraich and Kushinagar.
He said, people could not accept the entire amount under the PMAY scheme.
“Previously, there was corruption and discrimination,” Yogi said, insisting that Jan Dhan’s account was opened at the banks after the direction of PM Modi connected leaks and in need of accepting the total number.
CM asks from beneficiaries if they receive the benefits of another scheme, including Ujwala, Saubhagya and Ayushman.
CM states that homes given to poor people under PMAY and CMay are part of the pro-people agenda from the BJP government in the center and country.
Yogi praised the Lakhimpur Kheri Administration to promote “cluster approach”, where in need of homes and facilities such as electricity and pipeline drinking water in the city of Landanpur.
“Previously, the development was seized with nepotism and caste.
However, when the government is well chosen by the people, the benefits of the scheme to reach every need,” Yogi emphasized.
He added, the state government was satisfied that 70% of PMAY owners were women, who in turn made them closer to Dream PM Modi to make women ‘Atmanirbhar’ (Mandiri).
Yogi also pitched with a rural family that was economically healthy and the state government to provide better facilities in villages.
“People should not completely depend on the government.
They should not help in bringing socio-economic people into the mainstream,” insisting.