New Delhi: The Delhi Court has issued eight accused of burning causes during riots February 2020, noted that there was no CCTV recording and no one identified them or accused of violations.
Additional Judge Vinod Yadav said the materials part 436 of the Indian criminal code (damage to fire or explosives), added in the charging sheet, “not at all made” from the material produced by the Investigation Agency.
Eight people were arrested based on 12 complaints submitted by various shop owners who accused that their shops were allegedly looted and damaged by hordes of riots during communal violence in Northeast Delhi.
The defendant was arrested based on the disclosure statement given by them in another case filed against them and identification by the police, which was posted as an officer defeating in the area.
Drive out eight accused, the judge said the part 436 IPC could not be called only based on the statement given by the police when 12 complainants claimed anything in this case in a written complaint.
“Smooth tooth comb analysis of written complaints revealed that there were no complainants who identified the people accused of being part of a horde of riots that had damaged their stores,” said Judge Session in the order of September 10, said there was no charges of complaints about the commission of the combustion In their shops and because the ingredients of the 436 IPC section are not made from complaints or statements.
Even from the photos submitted on the note, there was no mischief incident with fire or explosive substances borne, he said, adding that there was no CCTV record or video clip incident on the recording.
Furthermore, ASJ Yadav said there was no evidence of the link in the form of an independent eyewitness statement that could see the people accused of occurrence.
The judge said a complainant said the crime allegedly occurred on February 25, while others claimed that it happened on February 24.
“Do complaints about different dates can be beaten by the Investigation Agency in one FIR is a question that will occur seen during the trial,” said the judge.
The police handed over the distance between various places where looting and vandalization occurred not many and assemblies that violated the same law operating in the regions on February 24 and 25 and thus, they could be said to be part of the same transaction and thus, one Single FIR Serving the purpose in this case.
Other parts are called in filling sheets such as part 147 (riots), 148 (riots, armed with deadly weapons), 149 (unlawful assemblies), 457 (home trespass), 380 (theft) (receiving stolen properties)) “exclusive can Traced “by the judge, said the judge.
He ordered the case to be transferred before the head of the metropolitan head.
Communal clashes have broken in Northeast Delhi in February 2020, after violence between supporters of the citizenship law (amendment) and the protesters tastes spinning out of control leaving at least 53 injured people.
8 disposal of burning costs in the case of RIOTS
