Nagpur: Refuse the attraction of a seriously injured accuser of two women from his love affair with one of them, the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court has observed that ‘the court cannot close his eyes to the suffering and sadness of women, and in the end for the call of the community’.
“The wrist from one of the victims was released and the little finger of the other person was cut off because of the attack.
Crime is a bad person committed in a brutal way, which shakes the conscience of the community.
The life imprisonment imposed by the court court is the right sentence in the fact of this case , “The division bench consisting of Judge Vinay Deshpande and Amir Borkar.
Petitioner Chandrashekhar Katre was awarded a strict prison sentence for brutal brutal life under the 307 IPC by the Bhandara session court on November 7, 2017.
The 44-year-old government challenged his vinden in HC which competed to kill the victim when he fell in love with one of them.
Pray for reduction in punishment, he showed that he had two small daughters and old parents to guard.
While maintaining his sentence, the HC bench clarified that while imposing adequate sentences about accused, it was one of the considerations for the protection of the community and a legitimate response to collective awareness.
“Proportional punishment is the obligation for the community, which extends faith in the court to improve evil.
Therefore, it is a court duty, while imposing a sentence, to remind himself about his respect for the rule of law,” said the judges said.
“Although the question of punishment is a matter of wisdom, it cannot be done by the court in a fantastic and strange way.
In fact, gravity violations against two women, do not have the capacity to protect themselves, speak for themselves,” they said.
Showing evidence, the judge said the women satisfactorily proved the defendant’s intention to kill them.
“Considering injuries caused by the victims and the way the attack was proven by prosecution, the defendant was intended to kill them.
It was a fate of the victim that the gravity of the attack on their head was enhanced by their hands which resulted in one-hand wrist detachment and small finger amputation from the other left hand.
Therefore, we are really satisfied that the applicant is guilty of violations under Section 307 and 452 IPC, “Bench said.
What HC said the crime accused of being vile, commitment in a brutal manner & the conscious punishment of the community imposed by court courts for life is the right gravity of violations of women, does not have the capacity to protect themselves, speak by itself, while imposing sentences.
To remind himself of his respect for the rule of law remembering the injury & the way of attacks, it is proven accused intended to kill them * Proportional punishment is the obligation to the community, which has faith in court.
Cannot close the eyes for the suffering & sadness of the victim: HC
