Thiruvananthapuram: Not only a group of headaches for AICC in determining the new DCC president.
In addition to the ‘A’ and ‘I’ ‘, K Sudhakaran group, V D Sathean and K C Venugopal also want their nominations given the DCC President’s post.
This has caused the current deadlock.
Meanwhile, Sudhakanan submitted a list to AICC even before reaching consensus among state leaders and this made the leaders of this group.
Now, AICC has decided to discuss more before finishing something.
However, opposition leader, Sathean explained that the announcement of the new district president would not be postponed outside this week.
The KPCC President is now in New Delhi to discuss with AICC leaders.
At least in half a dozen district, there is no consensus on the name to be appointed as President of the District Committee.
“If the group used to share the district post for many years, there is now a rigid lobby from leaders such as Sudhakanan, Sathean and Venugopal to appoint their nomination.
The KPCC president has explained that he will not give up on the demands of group leaders.
That, deadlock continues, “said a senior party leader about uncontrolled delays in completing the list.
It was lowned that the dispute continued to complete the names for posts in Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, Alappuzha, Ernakulam, Kottayam and Palakkad.
Despite ‘I’ and ‘A’ have risked their claim in Thiruvananthapuram, the name suggested by Sathean has delayed the decision.
Likewise in Kollam, Kodikunnil Suresh wants his candidate as president and both groups against his views.
In Alappuzha, ‘I’ The Group wants Chennithala candidates appointed as president but there is a rigid lobby from Venugopal to appoint someone who is trusted; The two leaders belonged to this district.
In Ernakulam, the ‘I’ and ‘A’ group had risked their claims, but Sathean also wanted its nominance to be appointed there.
The ‘A’ group couldn’t even dream of leaving Kottayam from their kitty.
But, the KPCC head wants a leader from outside the group to be appointed there.
The situation in Palakkad in such a way that Sathean, Sudhakaran and Venugopal have their own nomination.
In Kozhikode, both groups opposed candidates for Muraleedharan who delayed the final decision.