MEERUT: When farmers JAT gathered together with their Muslim colleagues to fight three agricultural laws, Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) said Aimim divided people by religion, which “helped BJP”.
Head of Aimim Asaduddin Owaisa, he said, is “Chacha Jaan (uncle) BJP”.
On a private event in Baghpat, National Spokesman BKU, Rakesh Tikait was spicy in his criticism to Owaisa.
When he was asked about a new university called Jat Icon King Mahendra Pratap Singh, Tikait said he was “a king of farmers”.
He added, “This is not a problem (for BJP) again.
Chacha Jaan Owaisi is here at Uttar Pradesh now.
Even if Chacha Jaan abuses BJP, the party will not register a case against it.
He has a BJP blessing.
He will divide people by religion And that’s what BJP wants.
“Jibe Tikait came two days after riding cm Yogi Adityanath said” Those who say “Abba Jaan” will digest all the rations (intended for poor people) before 2017 (when BJP has power in the country).
” Earlier this month, the leader of the Muslim farmers who had the influence of Ghulam Mohammad Jola had shared with Tikait and his brother, President Bku Naresh, at Muzaffarnagar Mahapanchayat farmers, where Tikait had raised the slogan “Allahu Akbar” and “Mahadev ‘property” and “Mahadev’s property” and ” Mahadev’s treasure “.
It was a symbolic step, setting aside a bloody history of Muzaffarnagar riots for common causes.
“Farmers understand their movements (ie Owieica and BJP) very well,” said Tikait.
“Let them hatch conspiracy.” Spinning back to Mahendra Pratap Singh’s question, he added, “They put five bricks and said we were establishing a university in his name.
Raja Mahendra Pratap Singh gave the land to Aligarh (Muslim University).
He gave land in Haridwar.
He contributed a lot of land and Selling his wealth for freedom struggles.
What can BJP say from the leaders? Nobody went to prison.
“About agricultural law, Tikait said farmers would not retreat.
“Our fight is with this government.
Farmers will not move until the three laws are revoked,” he said.
“The center said he wanted to talk but also said it would not take back agricultural law.
How are the two?”