Nagpur: criticized Pune-based education director for not responding to a complaint of a teacher, which was expelled from school after the number of students run out, the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court said he was “still running the pillar to send and the community called him a teacher, a teacher and respected person, which forms future generations of society “.
“The complaint submitted by the Petitioner in this case with the Director and Deputy Director of Education in the city falling in deaf ears.
Tired, he approached this court by submitting a petition.
But here too, the respondents have not responded to the sensitivity and sensitivity as those of which It is expected from them in such cases, “said the division bench consisting of Judge Sunil Shukre and Antil Kior.
The Applicant of Subhash Shende, through his advice so that Ahmed, approached the judiciary after he was dealing with high schools carried out by Itwari Education Sansta because the student’s strength was reduced.
The action was taken according to the rules of 26 Maharashtra employees from private schools (service conditions) (MEPS) (Meps) Rules, 1981.
He was declared surplus and directed to be absorbed in Vikas Vidyalaya in the Wardha Hingangphat area.
Shende, who has joined Itwari High School in 1990 because teaching English and geography, argues that there are two junior teachers who are under it on the list of seniority, which can be taken into account according to general rules of rules 26 (2) (i) of the Meps rules .
The applicant argued that being a member of the Scheduled caste and the only teacher available for the subject, he taught a higher class and therefore, he should not be removed.
He made a representation to the Deputy Director of Education, but did not have an impact.
He also tried to join the assignment at a hingangphat-based school, but he met rigid resistance there and was not allowed to work.
The Assistant Government of Amit Madiwale’s government then convinced the judges that he would look for instructions from Deputy Director and Education Officer Zilla Parishad with the intention of recovering the position of the Petitioner who was missing and also brought the honor because of him.
The bench then postponed hearing until September 28, asked AGP to submit a reply to the progress made.
What HC said * Complaints of the Petitioner with Director & Deputy Director of Education fell on the ears of deaf * He approached HC by filing a petition two years ago * Respondents have not responded with sensitivity & sensitivity as expected of them in cases * made to run the pillar * post since 2 years and the community calls him a teacher
The court slammed the edu director to ignore the complaints of teachers
