New Delhi: While Rahul Gandhi economically in his response to the demands of the CWC leaders that he took over the party’s expression again, he explicitly said that he had certain thoughts about how everything was supposed to be and that he would feel comfortable if all.
walking together.
He also looked for “ideological clarity” among party officials.
Pointing to Punjab CM Chararjit Channi, said Rahul when he called to convey to Channi that he would replace Amarinder Singh, the last break by disbelief.
Channi apparently told Rahul that he did not believe a dalit from a humble background was appointed as cm.
With that anecdote, Rahul said caste awareness was still there and was difficult to accept.
Separating other incidents he had witnessed, Rahul said he did not believe in “untouched” and that every person who is helpless and persecution, including women who face discrimination and are not heard, oppressed.
CWC members said Rahul added that during the moral episode Lynching, he wanted to visit the village when he was rejected by crime, but some people had other views.
Scion Gandhi said that every person who was helpless denied hearing must be supported regardless of identity.
When Rahul registered his agenda after the demands that he took over leadership, the problem of the selection of heat organizations, which had polarized the party and even created the G23 dissident block, died peacefully.
While the party veteran Ak Antony led the choir for Rahul to take control of the party, Ashok Gehlot said Sonia and Priyanka urged him to ask for Rahul to take over since he heard his advice.
Channi said the decision to appoint him as president to take CWC and that he should not refuse, the request that met with the agreement of Chhattisgarh cm Bhupesh Baghel and Priyanka.
Participants at CWC said the senior leaders of Ghulam Prophet Azad, Anand Sharma and Mutter Wasnik gave advice on party functions.
AICC manager Randeep Surjewala, Jitendra Singh and Ajay made lashed at G23 to have dinner and give a press statement.
Rahul pitch for ‘ideological clarity’ between parties
