Patna: The Patna High Court on Thursday rejected the regular guarantee petition Mokama MLA Anant Kumar Singh in connection with the alleged recovery of Assault AK-47 rifles, ammunition and hand grenades from his personal residence in the BARH police station area.
in the patna countryside.
In addition to the rifle, 26 live cartridges were published in his magazine and at all two military hand-grenades wrapped in carbon papers were recovered from inside his nurse in a police attack on August 16, 2019.
Singh initially avoided arrest and surrendered before the Metropolitan Court in Saket, Delhi on August 23, 2019.
He was then taken to Patna.
Since then, he is behind the bar at the Beur Central Jail.
Activities that violate strict law (prevention) were called in the FIR against it but were dropped in Chargesheet.
The bail petition submitted in June this year has appeared to hear before the judicial bench Anjani Kumar Sharan.
While rejecting the guarantee, the bench observed that Singh had to support the low court in getting the trial of the case quickly.
Ajay Kumar Thakur’s advisor who appeared for MLA on Thursday argued that the trial had not been completed in this case even when the High Court was directed to resolve it in nine months ago.
Thakur also proposed that the deposition of investigative officers in a trial that described the recovery place did not specify that it was home Singh.
The Public Prosecutor Ajay Mishra opposed Thakur’s argument, proposed that all witnesses prosecution had continued in the trial within six months after the HC command last year.
He handed himself because Singh that the trial was delayed because he did not appear before the court to complete the 313 CRPC procedure where he had to take him to explain to him in the trial.
Mishra also submitted that Singh has repeatedly taken reasons such as hearing problems and other problems to postpone the trial.
This for the second time the High Court rejected Singh’s regular bail application in this case.
On June 11, 2020, Prabhat Kumar Jha JHA had rejected his guarantee in the direction to a lower court to conduct a daily trial in this case and concluded it in nine months.