NEW DELHI: The Centre on Tuesday revised its pension guidelines to allow it to be compulsory for any retired government servant who’s worked within an intellect or security-related firm, to look for prior consent from the mind of this organisation prior to making any book pertaining to domain of their organisation or some sensitive data about the disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty, integrity or safety of India.
The change in Rule 8 Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 — pertaining to grave misconduct within a pensioner and activity against such misconduct — which introduces this illness doesn’t own a time bar concerning post-retirement applicability.
It is apparently obviously aimed at assessing episodes of retired intelligence officers, such as people who have led the organisations such as Intelligence Bureau or RAW, spilling the beans onto working of those agencies or more sensitive surgeries, in novels they occasionally writer post-retirement.
A few of the novels have ended up producing controversies.
Any grave misconduct, if shown contrary to the pensioner, could cause his/her retirement to be withdrawn, either in total or in part.
The ministry of employees, at a notification issued Tuesday, said Regulations (a) at sub-rule 3A in Rule 8 in the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 was being substituted having a clause which says that no government slave, that, having functioned at virtually any intellect or security-related organisation contained in the Second Schedule of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (22 of 2005), will, without any prior clearance from the mind of this organisation, create any book following retirement, of any other substance about and including domain name of this organisation, like any mention or advice about any employees and their designation, and experience or knowledge obtained by virtue of working in the firm.
The state also applies to novel of sensitive data, the disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or financial interests of this State, compared with a foreign State or that could cause incitement of an offence.
Clause 3B follows, saying the mind of this organisation will vest with the ability to determine as to whether the suggested material for novel is either not sensitive or non-sensitive, and if it falls into the realm name of their organization.
The rules also create changes in Type 26, necessitating pensioners to create a job that rescue with the previous approval of the competent jurisdiction, they will not print in any fashion, whereas in service or after retirement, any other data or material or understanding that’s linked to the realm of their organisation and acquired by virtue of my functioning from the said firm.
“This statement is agreeing my duties and accountability, concerning the appropriate conduct rules, retirement principles, legislation dealing with offences relating to official secrets or national safety along with the Intelligence Organisations (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1985 (58 of 1985), as the case might be.
I further agree that in case of any collapse of the above mentioned project by mepersonally, the decision of this Government as to if it was supposed to prejudicially affect the elements mentioned above will be binding on me,” moves the project.
Retired intel officers Today need to take Previous govt nod Prior to publishing tell-all Novels
