New Delhi: The Directorate of Higher Education Delhi has written a letter to representatives of the Chancellor of the University of Delhi Yogesh Singh asking him to take disciplinary action against the Delhi Principal who was funded by a government that had protested over the past few months.
Reacting to this, the Association of the University of Delhi (Duta) said that the Directorate of Higher Education intimidated the Principal and 12 universities, adding it to condemn the Delhi government for this issue.
Duta said, “The Directorate of Higher Education failed not responsibility to release a timely grant”.
Safe! You have managed to throw your voteogin to see the results
In this letter of education, it was said that this grant was released by the Delhi government to this college in four installments according to the rules.
Duta President Rajib Ray said that the letter written by the Directorate of Higher Education to the Chancellor’s representative must be withdrawn immediately.
“First, it was surprising that the Delhi government did not realize the scope of CCS rules that did not apply to teachers of the Central University or the principles of the University of Delhi,” he said.
He said that the funding guidelines for these universities were clearly placed and guided by UGC regulations and regulations and universities and not by aid patterns.
The Delhi government tried to impose this agreement at 12 of these universities, which have been opposed by teachers and principals.
Duta President Rajib Ray said that under the pattern of aid, the government basically wanted to avoid his responsibilities to governance by forcing universities to pay from their own funds.
Furthermore, the accusation that the principal avoided teachers to protest and asked the Chancellor’s representative to start actions against those who were condemned.
He said that this was another effort to mislead the real problems that the Delhi government did not provide timely funds and staff in many universities without salaries for several months.
Duta said the university’s response to the letter was both surprising because the ambassador charmed the attention of the new Chancellor for this crisis and looked for direct intervention.
Instead, the University cites business codes, which have accused employees.
