Glasgow: With the COP26 post for the last day without a definite call on the main problems such as climate and carbon market financing, a group of 22 countries including India – called the same-minded developing countries (LMDC) – on Thursday protested strongly against “colonization Carbon) “In the context of developed countries that try to enforce 1.5 degree heating limits.
LMDC groups including India, China, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Bolivia and Indonesia are referred to as ‘carbon colonialism’.
“Developed countries pushed 1.5 degrees Celsius narratives very hard.
We know that this narrative will direct them to control the world once more.
And countries that cannot reach zero zero targets in 2050, they will be condemned ethically and Financial.
It is unfair.
It opposes climate justice, “said Diego Pacheco, Bolivia’s main negotiator, representing the LMDC group.
They called calling the Conference Presidency not to adopt the “mitigation-centric approach” by maintaining the purpose of 1.5 degrees Celsius as “collective responsibility” of all countries in the Glasgow decision text and requesting it “completely removes paragraphs on mitigation” in the revision of the text .
Paragraphs in mitigation in the text, which will be resolved only after consensus, including language collectively trying to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C above the pre-industrial level (1850-1900), as opposed to the target below the target below under the target below the target below the target below the target.
Which puts 2 degrees C as the upper limit while maintaining 15 degrees C as an aspirational destination.
The text also requested a commitment from 196 countries to increase the climate target by 2023 to maintain the purpose of heating limits of 1.5 degrees Celsius alive and to be delivered next year their long-term decarbonization strategies on the promised zero zero trajectory.
Speaking on behalf of the group at a press conference, Pacheco said, “We asked developed countries to achieve real reduced emissions immediately and in 2030, in this decade.
They cannot take a very far target in the future …
we as LMDC Not accepting that this police will be a scenario to transfer historical responsibility to developing countries.
“LMDC members also state the need for higher financial mobilization of developed countries instead of trying to change narratives to mitigation and goals of 2050 ‘zero’ Which, the group thinking, opposing the principles of justice and responsibility that are different but different (CBDR) and the capabilities of each (RC) as immortalized in the United Nations Convention and the Paris Agreement.
“We will not accept any changes in the CBDR principle.
There must be differentiation.
There must be recognition for CBDR in the negotiation process.
And there must also be a recognition of the pre-2020 ambition gap.
So, if we will receive zero zero in 2050 for all The country, developing countries will be trapped in a very unfair way to overcome climate change, “Pacheco said.