New Delhi: Even though he blames the government for a non-consultation approach behind the current protest which leads to the decision to revoke agriculture laws, SC Anil Ghanwat panel members say farmers who protest with several leaders who don’t seem to respect how the minimum free market is Regulated can allocate national resources for their most productive use ” NV Ramana, who asked for a published panel report.
He previously written to CJI in September, claiming that the recommendations of the three members committee would open the way to resolve the crisis and end farmer agitation.
Urging CJI for the second time to make a public report, Ghanwat on Tuesday Make it Ulis, “After the government’s decision to revoke agricultural laws in the upcoming winter parliamentary session, the Committee’s report was no longer relevant to the law but there was a suggestion in a report on the problem of farmers who had public interests.
“SC has been on January 12, a committee to listen to farmers’ complaints relating to agricultural law and government views, and to make recommendations.
The panel at that time on March 19 submitted a report to the Apex court.
However, the report has not been published.
Ghanwat, in his letter, emphasizing the need for reform, by saying that specific laws may no longer exist, “Impulse reforms reflected in this law are not diluted”.
“Many Indian farmers who are desperate to be updated, no less, focus on reform – especially market freedom and freedom technology.
This law is accepted in principle by our farmer’s movement but is not fully accepted by farmers because the Indian government policy process is not consultative, “he said.
Committee members on agricultural law wrote to CJI
