New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday searched for a response from Delhi Police on the Application of Baron Real Estate Sushil and Gopal Ansal seeking suspension of their seven-year imprisonment provisions given to damage the evidence in the case of Fire Cinema Uphaar 1997 who had claimed 59 life.
Read AlsouPhaar Cinema Fire: The Court rejected Ansals’s request to suspend their prison term in evidence that damaged the Casea session court in Delhi on Friday rejecting the request of an ansal and other brothers and sisters who saw a suspension of sentences in overcoming the evidence in 1997 the case of the fire tragedy of Uphaar, Ani It has been reported on December 3, an additional session of an anil anil judge has rejected an analysis of Ansals to suspend their punishment and prison period in evidence that damaged the case by the Masters Court and refused to release the inmate in the guarantee.
Senior adviser to beat Rohatgi, emerged for the applicant, attacked the session court order and argued that the seven-year period exceeded the maximum penalty that could be given in this case.
He handed over that the sentence was on the “wrong law premise” and emphasized that even in the main case, the applicants were punished and sentenced to two years in prison by the Supreme Court who later released them on payment of Rs 30 Crore each after taking into account the prison time They have done it.
While rejecting the request of ansals for suspension of punishment until the appeal of the confidence by the Magisterial Court was decided, the court session said that the case was one of the great of its kind and its violations appear to be the result of the design calculated in the part of the convict disrupting the course of justice.
Court sessions also refused to suspend their seven-year prison terms each to the former Dinesh Chand Sharma court and the other two – P P Batra and Anoop Singh – in the case and released them on guarantees.
“The nature of the crime in such a way as to attack in the functioning of the court.
The findings of guilt have been given by the court of the trial by the court concerned, “said the court session.
The session court has added that the sentence of suspension at this stage will not only oppose the principles of established criminal law but shake the trust of the general public in the justice system.
Senior Vikas Pahwa Advocate, emerging for the association of victims of the Uphaar (AVUT) tragedy, has opposed the appeal and told the court that violations of destruction are very serious, because they affect the entire criminal justice system.
Police Delhi also opposed the fields of appeal by Ansals and told the court session that it would trigger mental trauma and the suffering of the victims.
Additional Public Prosecutor T Ansari, emerged for agency, had told the court that the sentence provided consolation to victims of tragedy and strengthened their faith in the justice delivery system which was also after 24 years.
The Magian Court also imposed a fine of RS 2.25 Crore each in Ansal-Ansal in addition to forcing seven years in this case.
Damaging was detected for the first time on July 20, 2002, and when it was excavated, the department’s investigation began against Sharma and he was suspended.
Then the investigation was carried out and he was stopped from the service on June 25, 2004.
This case lodged in the direction of the Delhi High Court while hearing the petition by the Averfut Chairson Neelam Krishnameorthy.
The fire broke out in the Uphaar cinema during the Hindi ‘border’ film screening on June 13, 1997, claiming 59 lives.
The problem will be heard on January 6.
Uphaar: HC Looking for Police Standing on an Ansals Application
