Pills in HC for reconstitution statutory board for amended – News2IN
Nagpur

Pills in HC for reconstitution statutory board for amended

Written by news2in

Nagpur: The day after a lawyer from the city lit a major shortage in the reconstitution of the Maharashtra Legal Development Board, the petition submitted in the Nagpur bench the Bombay High Court in this case will be changed by entering this new development.
Firlos Mirza, has expertise in constitutional matters, on Friday saying that Indian President Ramnath Kovind did not extend the term of office after that occurred on April 30 last year.
Therefore, both the state government led by the main minister of Uddhav Thackeray and BS Governor Koshyari can do anything to compile them, according to Mirza.
Sensel Shreehari Aney, who represented the two applicants, told TII that they would move the prayer of the amendment application for direction to the Government of India to take steps to extend the term of office of Darmali development by making a request to the President in this matter.
“This important aspect somehow escaped from the study conducted by the Applicant.
However, we have made the Union of India as one of our respondents in PIL.
One must show the governor to write a letter to the President to bring this aspect forward.
Previously, I have written a letter to Koshyari for an appointment of this problem, but there is no answer or recognition from his side, “he said.
BJP leaders blame the MVA government for this issue.
“But the ball is in the party’s court court in the middle,” said Energy Minister Nitin Raut asked the Safron Party to conduct self-introspection.
“In their term, BJP also dropped the word” law “from the development board, thus violating the constitution.
At least the leaders are now in Maharashtra must lead and spin their seniors in Delhi to approach the earliest president, so the council can be dissolved without delay Furthermore, “he told Toi.
The opposition leader Devendra Fanilas, however, told TII that the country’s cabinet needed to move a proposal with the President through the governor and not a central cabinet.
Fadniv said the last time when the expansion was given by the President during his term as CM, his cabinet recommended it through the governor.
“The president can delegate this responsibility to the governor.
Both houses have discussed this issue in detail during the budget session,” Fadnivis said.
* CASE – Mastery of the Statutory Development Board on April 30, 2020 – Pro-vidarbha activist Nitin Ronghe and Kapil Chandrayan (former VSDB member) accused Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) the government failed to make a new promise on these boards – they knocked on the door of the court for the reconstitution of this council for Vidarbha, Marathwada and throughout India – blaming the country and the governor not to act, they pray for direction to the center of the imposition of the President’s rules based on Article 356 of the Constitution issued a notification to the Secretary of the Head of the Central Government and the State while criticizing the last to discriminate against the region rear like vidarbha.

About the author

news2in