Kolkata: The single bench of the Calcutta High Court will say an assessment in the election petition by the West Bengal Head Minister Mamata Banerjee on July 7 which seeks Justice Kaushik Chanda from hearing.
On June 24, the Calcutta High Court kept judgment on the Bengal Bengal Banerjee’s Bengal Head Mamata’s head challenging the results of the Nandigram election.
The main minister also appeared for the trial virtually.
A justice bench Kaushik Chanda said the applicant had the full right to move for determination and rest assured, this problem would be legally decided.
Justice Chanda asked Singhvi if she knew the BJP organizational structure.
In return for Justice Chanda, Singhvi said, “I have many friends at BJP.
I am quite aware.” For this, Judge Chanda said he remembered the casing.
The Singhvi Applicant Lawyer said that the instance showed Chanda’s justice had a connection with BJP and mentioned the case where the judge moved the application of the intervention in his name.
“Your lawyer also has a political affiliation.
You from Congress and Mookherjee have a BJP background.
But you appear for the case of the Banerjee TMC MAMATA,” Justice Chanda said to Singhvi.
West Bengal Bengal’s head has also moved the application to change the judge in this case and allege that Chanda’s justice has a connection with BJP.
The election election commission has stated that Suvendu Adhikari BJP is the winner in the hardest election for Nandigram constituencies.
After his defeat at Nandigram, Mamata Banerjee accused the officers who returned from the assembly chair said he was threatened with the vote count.
Even though Banerjee loses a chair to Adhikari, which used to be nearby aide, TMC registered the victory of landslides in a poll that won 213 seats at 294 members of the West Bengal Assembly.
While BJP lost the poll but appeared as the second largest party with 77 seats.
TMC even wrote to Chief Electoral Officer, West Bengal searching for “Voice Return Calculation and Pos Ballots” in the Nandigram Constituency, but the recount was rejected for unknown reasons.
“Rejection like that is bad in law …
We demand the immediate calculation of Nandigram AC 210 to preserve the sanctity of the selection process,” TMC said in a letter to the CEO.