New Delhi / Mumbai: Meeting between Sharad Pawar and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for one hour on Saturday on the order of veteran Maratha about amendments to the change in banking law departs speculation lead NCP to claim that they cannot harmonize with BJP.
Closed one hour discussion, which occurred after a fight between coalition members, Congress, NCP and Sena in power Maharashtra, triggered a political chat showing a hidden motive behind Satrap Wily who called for BJP leaders.
One-one-one by Maharashtra minister Minister Uddhav Thackeray with Modi has raised the same storm, and was nicknamed Shiv Sena’s efforts to send messages to MVA allies on willingness to explore political choices.
While PMO tweeted about meetings with photos of the two leaders, the pawar wrote on the Micro-Blogging site, “Meeting Hon’ble Prime Minister from our country Narendra Modi.
Discussing various problems of national interests.” The speculation produced by the meeting was quite serious for spokesmen NCP Nawab Malik to contact a press conference in Mumbai and reports that the pawar-modi meet has implications for the state government.
Malik said NCP and BJP like two ends of the river, which could never meet because they were ideologically opposite.
He also said that the pawar had told the Thackeray cm and the leaders of Congress on the meeting proposed a few days ago.
“It is a scheduled meeting.
The Chairman of the Minister of UDDHAV Thackeray and Secretary General AICC HK Patil is also aware of the meeting.
Prima Facie, Pawar knocked on the PM door to express concern for amendments to Banking Regulations and Creation of the Ministry of Cooperation Led by Amit Shah.
Pawar has written a comprehensive letter to PM, “Malik said.
“The first pawar talked to PM on an anti-bank amendment, but then PM felt that it would be better if there was a personal discussion.
Therefore, the pawar meets modi, ” Malik added.
Then, the pawar tweeted the letter he wrote to PM About amendments in the Banking Act.
“I want to show certain inconsistencies and the results of the law produced from the normative provisions of conflicting actions, the most specific to the 97th constitutional amendment, the state cooperative society acts and with the principles of cooperation.
“I reaffirmed the letter that the objectives and objectives of the actions that were amended with good intentions and many provisions needed.
The wrong board and management must be further followed up and the interests of depositors must be protected, but at the same time it must be ensured that when doing it, principle – The principle of cooperation stipulated in the constitution is not sacrificed in the altar above and zealous regulations, “pawar tweeted.
NCP also said the pawar revealed the order of the newly formed cooperation ministry led by Amit Shah, on the grounds that the cooperative sector was the subject of the country.
“NCP will never be hand in hand with BJP because both parties are ideologically different.
BJP and NCP are two ends of the river that cannot unite as long as there is water on the river,” said Malik.
In his letter to Modi, the pawar shows that while the merger, regulations and improving cooperative communities have been intended as the subject of the state, the RBI based on the provisions introduced, can directly intervene in the function of the cooperative bank.
“In my opinion, new provisions are unconstitutional and ultra vires, because they have been passed without legislative competency,” said Pawar.