New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to remain an assessment of HC Bombay enforce the validity of the telecommunications settings of the New Indian tariff orders NTO 2.0, which was told in January last year and had placed RS 12 hats, not existing Hospital 19 with a payment channel price.
Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation, Organizations of private TV broadcasters, and many other private channels have transferred SC which challenges HC’s decision that accuses that NTO 2.0 interferes with their fundamental rights to carry out certain trade or professions, guaranteed based on Article 19 of the Constitution.
Appearing for the Petitioners, suggesting Mapping Rohatgi, supported by senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, NK Kaul, Amit Sibal and Gopal Jain, argued before the chairman of Judge NV Ramana and Hakyat Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose that when the government did not regulate the price of cinema tickets, why he was Do it for the price of TV channels.
But the CJI LED bench said it would not be feasible to provide any assistance even though Rohatgi and others insisted on staying at the NTO 2.0 operation.
For Trai, Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi and Advocate Sanjay Kapur said HC had refused to stay while on the operational NTO after rejecting the petition of announcers who challenged NTO validity.
Dwivedi said HC has validated new rates after examining the provisions thoroughly.
“Publishers and TV channels cannot raise the price of channels on their wishes and fantasies,” he said.
SC refused to stay Bombay HC decided to order new Trai rates
