Mumbai: In the order of a detailed 68 pages issued five accused, including PWD engineers and developers and their families in the case of Maharashtra Sadan’s scam, the ACB court specifically observed that unhurried hasters were made in the inn, and anti-corruption.
Bureau (ACB) profit assessment made by developers and disadvantages is implied by the state government, without taking the help of an expert, inappropriate and illegal.
The court said that from Chargesheet and papers, it seems that most of the calculations have been made by the informant Narendra Talegaonkar, who works as ACP in ACB, the Mumbai division.
“Nothing, he is an architect or engineer.
He is not an expert,” said Satbhai’s Special Judge.
The case concerning the NCP contract Chhagan Bhujbal allegedly gave the company, K Chamankar Enterprises, without inviting a tender in 2005 when he was the Minister of PWD.
Today, Bhujbal is again the cabinet minister in the MVA government.
The enforcement directorate conducted an investigation on charges of money laundering against Bhujbal and others in the connected case.
The case was waiting before the Special PMLA court.
The one issued on July 31 by the Special ACB court was the developer and architect Pravina Chamankar, Praneeta Chamankar, Prasnana Chamankar and Krushna Chamankar along with former PWD Engineer Arun Devdhar.
In a reasoning available on Monday, the court said, “Investigative officers …
(already) did not verify the materials collected to be accused.
Only the ingredients that benefit (SIC) have been sent together with Chargesheet.
From the facts revealed in the document obtained by the defendant No.
11 (Prasnana Chamankar) under the information law, arises that sterling quality material has been detained by investigative officers.
“The court said that the task of the investigative officer to evaluate two sets of documents and materials collected and, if needed, To free the defendant at the investigation stage itself, given the rights of the defendant for a fair investigation process.
The court said that even though investigative officers had to take the assistance of deputy directors (building and communication departments), a designated private architect whose report was unsatisfactory or reliable.
The architect said, a “expert assessment”, submitted his report on June 9, 2015, but before that, on June 4, 2015, relying on his report, permission to register the crime was sought, where the reporting points were.
“Prima-facie, it shows that jokes were created to make the appointment of the architect on June 30, 2015 and before that a profitable and comfortable report that is in accordance with the accusation is sought from it.
When the appointment of the architect dated June 30, 2015, registering FIR on 11 June 2015 Basic reports of his opinion, go to show bad intentions in staying FIR by Informant Narendra Talegaonkar, “said the court.
The court further said that as searched for, PWD’s opinion concluded that there was no illegality in the contract and that the feasibility report was prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations and practices in the PWD received in December 2015, at that time it was first submitted.
“This shows that in a hurry that should not be made at the Cemara Inn.
Informants and other ACB officers do not feel the need to wait for PWD’s opinion,” said the court.
It is said that even a rental accountant is not appointed even though it needs to be expressed by DCP, ACB, in a report with additional CP, ACB, in December 2014.
The court said until May 2015, no complaints or complaints of anyone loss had been caused by the state because of the contract .
ACB Court said Maha Sadan FIR was hastily archived
