Mumbai: Special Court here has said that there is enough material to show that the accusation of Anand Teltumde activists, was arrested in the case of Elggar Parishad-Maoist, was the Prima Facie right.
The court also said that it did not find accusations against Teltumde for “Inherently impossible” or “fully extraordinary”, and Prima Facie he was involved in activities that prohibit prohibited organizations.
Special judge D e Kothalikar, maintaining the problem of being trusted by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), making observations while rejecting the Teltumde bail application on July 12, although detailed sequences are available on Friday.
“After reading documents, including e-mail exchanges and statements of witnesses relying on prosecution, and after crossing the truth of the accusation carried out on my voice, this court did not find the allegations.
Inherently it is impossible or completely difficult,” said the court.
“Instead, I did not hesitate to conclude that there was enough material to allow the court to reach the Prima Facie conclusion that the accusation made by the applicant (Teltumde) was the prime facie.
Right,” said the judge.
The court further said there was no obstacle to record the satisfaction of the Prima Facie that there was a material against the applicant to show his involvement in crime.
Also note that the evidence and documents submitted by Prosecution Prima Facie showed that the applicant was the Prima Facie involved in the activities of the forbidden organization.
Nia previously claimed that Teltumde was an active member of CPI (Maois) and spreading its activities.
“I hold that there is enough prime facie ingredients on records that will reveal the active role and participation of the applicant,” said the court.
Among other reasons, Lawyers Teltumde, urged the court to consider aspects that investigations in crime have been completed and the applicant is a qualified person.
However, the court cited the command of the Supreme Court and noted that the fact that his demands had been put forward against the applicant could not be used to support the applicant, but opposed it.
“As stated earlier, the court considering the guarantee application is needed to maintain a good balance between social interests vis-a-vis personal freedom accused, by following the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence.” In this background, this dispute from the applicant is that the educational qualification and social background, it should be considered when determining the guarantee application, responsible for being discarded, “said Judge.
Teltumde, arrested by Nia in April last year, has been in January 2021 Guarantee that states that the theory of prosecution that he was “was fighting or trying to make a war or incite the community was Humbug.
“Teltumde is currently submitted in Taloja Prison in Navi Mumbai.