Mumbai: In rare instances, a pocso (protection of children from sexual offenses) Act Court today directed the prosecution to take legal action against 21-year-old woman and her mother to spin hostile in the case in which they are accused.
A 22-year-old boy raped a young child as young children and pregnant.
The alleged victim, a former state-level throwball, claiming a 17 year old when she was pregnant.
In a police complaint, she accused the man who menghamesinya rape.
Alleged victims and accused of later married in June 2019, four months after the FIR was filed, and now parents to a daughter.
“The marriage between the defendant and the victim may be the reason because they do not support the prosecution case.
But because of their attitude, the backbone of the prosecution case has collapsed,” the court said.
The woman and her mother had been hostile during the trial, pulling back from their previous statements.
“I can not prove the victim is a minor, drop Charges Posco, the court said that no one came in the record to prove the alleged guilt.” …
So I was constrained to conclude that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond doubt dubious violation …
rape on the victim by the accused, “the court said.
as an option, the prosecution could move to appeal the charges perjuriy against the duo.
perjury knowingly makes false testimony under oath.
in India it attracts a prison sentence of up to seven years.
FIR said that as olahragon, the complainant who used to travel across town to supporting them.
During his training, he met the defendant, also a player.
FIR said that in January 2019, the defendant called him to the train station to see him.
From there, he took her to a room where he proposed to her and forced her to have sex.
this allegedly happened three times.
FIR l ebih further said that in March 2019 after the HSC board exam, minors suffering from jaundice.
Subsequently, in June 2019 when he upset stomach and his mother took him to the doctor, he discovered six months pregnant.
Because of that, his mother took him to the police station and alleged that the accused with false promises of marriage, raping minor.
The court said that the prosecution could not prove in court that the alleged victims were minors and dropped the charge POCSO.
(The identity of the victim has not been revealed to protect her privacy as directed by the Supreme Court on cases related to sexual violence)