Prayagraj: Observing that adults have the right to choose their spouse apart from religion that benefit from them, the High Court of Allahabad on Thursday gave protection to the interfaith couple from Gorakhpur.
In such cases, even their parents can object to their relationship, the court is further observed.
Hearing the petitions together submitted by Shifa Hasan and Hindu partners, the division bench consisting of justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Deepak’s justice Verma was observed, “it cannot be debated that two adults have the right to the choice of their matrimonial partners regardless of religion that is released from their religion.
” “Because this petition is a joint petition by the two individuals who claim to love each other and departments, therefore, in our opinion are considered, no, even their parents, can reject their relationships”, the court added in the assessment delivered on Thursday .
In a combined petition, the Petitioner’s dispute is that they love each other and live together with their own will.
However, their relationship was not accepted by several members of their family and they.
Disrupt their peaceful lives.
After hearing all parties long, the court provided protection to the couple, said that even their parents could even object to their relationship.
Thus, the court directed the police authority to ensure that the applicants were not worn there was harassment by the girl’s father or by someone else in connection with their relationship with each other.
During hearing, the Petitioner – Hasan was put forward before the court that he also applied for conversion from Muslims to Hinduism.
According to him, in the application, District Judge (DM) called for a report from the police station concerned.
According to the report, the boy’s father was not fun marriage even though his mother was ready for the same thing.
Both parents from Hasan opposed marriage.
Given the same thing, the couple approaches HC claims that there is a threat to their lives.
The court recorded the fact that the two applicants were Major, aged 19 and 24 years.
Therefore, the court proceeded to provide protection to them, while clarifying that the order was not the last opinion regarding the age of the applicant because the findings were only prima facie in nature for the need to decide on the problem related to protection.