Ahmedabad: Nitin Patel City Unja will eventually get RS 50,000 with an interest of 9% from 2001 as compensation for the wrong procedure.
Patel has searched for a procedure for handling his hearing loss and the ENT surgeon cannot extract the dye after pouring it into his ear.
Patel must undergo another operation to get rid of the material.
So that the end to pay compensation is carried out on January 10.
In accordance with the details of the case, in January 2000, Patel Consulted Surgeon Surgeon Dr.
Rakesh Pathak at Unjha to overcome hearing loss in his left ear.
The doctor proposed the implantation of hearing aids and Patel agreed.
Before instilling a hearing aid, the doctor poured several material to Patel’s ear, which attached to his eardrum.
The doctor tried to extract it for three days but could not succeed.
Patel began to experience problems in his ears, including swelling.
He said that he could not hear properly with his left ear.
Patel must consult with another ENT surgeon, Dr.
Haresh Trivedi, who performs the operation to resolve the problem.
Patel sued Dr.
Pathak, moved Mehsana Regency, consumer disputes negotiations.
Dr.
Pathak defended himself, saying the patient did not become deaf, because of his treatment.
The doctor said Patel had experienced a problem in his ear and was therefore agreed to instill a hearing aid.
But the dye poured into his ear would not come out.
The Commission noted that Patel’s claim that his deafness was caused by Dr.
Pathak treatment was wrong because he had suffered the problem.
However, he said negligence on the doctor’s part that he could not eliminate the material from the ear of the patient using his expertise.
He did not consult or refer to the case to a senior doctor, the commission was observed.
In 2010, doctors were asked to pay Rs 50,000 to patients as compensation for the treatment he had to take from another doctor.
Dr.
Pathak moved the Gujarat consumer recovery commission; The challenge is unsuccessful.