New Delhi / Pune: Hoping from the initial resolution to protest long-term farmers at the National Capital Border, key members of the panel appointed by the Supreme Court about the laws debated on Wednesday said the report delivered by the committee was “penny percent” support Farmers and peak courts must take problems without delay.
Panel members acknowledge that the government and the Supreme Court must consider legal and order problems that may arise with the release of the report they need to spend time, but “they cannot throw it away and they cannot throw it away.” Shetkari Sanghatana President Anil J Ghanwat, a panel member Having written to the chief Justice of India on September 1 urged him to make the report public, also said the committee did not support the revocation of three laws, because he was asked by protesting farmers, but he and his organization would certainly believe that there was a “many defects” in the law which needs to be handled.
Because it was very important for the APEX court to let go of the report in the earliest public domain to remove all farmer concerns, Ghanwat told PTI.
“The report must be published earliest.
If they do it tomorrow, it will be better …
When people will know the contents of the report, they will decide whether new agricultural laws support farmers or not,” he said.
It has been five months since we sent our report to court and I could not understand what could be the reason for not acknowledging the report, he said, and urged the court to release the earliest report.
.
In his letter to CJI, Ghanwat said, “The report has discussed all the worries of farmers.
The Committee believes that recommendations will open the way to resolve the ongoing farmer agitation.” While suspending the implementation of three agricultural laws, the Supreme Court has formed a committee on January 12, 2021, where Ghanwat was nominated as a member to represent the agricultural community.
Another member of the Committee is Ashok Gulati, a former chairman of the commission for agriculture and price (CACP) and Pramod Kumar Joshi from the International Food Policy Research Institute.
“As a member of the Committee, especially those who represent the farmer community, I feel sick that the problems raised by farmers are not resolved and agitation continues.
I feel that the report has not been given attention by Hon ‘.
Ble the Supreme Court,” Ghanwat wrote in his letter.
He said the APEX court had to release a panel report for the implementation of its recommendations for “peaceful resolution of the deadlock on the earliest satisfaction.” Asked whether the views stated in the letter written to CJI were supported by other Committee members, said Ghanwat, “Actually, they support it.
But they are not ready to say in writing.
They are happy that I have raised this problem.” He said the panel report was 100 percent for the sake of farmers and the country, but answered negative when asked whether the committee had supported the protest of farmers’ requests for new legal revocation.
“No.
We don’t support that,” he said.
“There are many defects in the new law.
Sanghatana Shetkari we also support new agricultural laws, but we also have concerns in some aspects.
Many participants told the same thing during deliberation,” he said, adding a view of everyone has been considered when considered When considered when considered when considered when considered when considered.
report.
The main concern is that the minimum support price (MSP) will be removed, but it is not true.
The new agricultural law did not talk about MSP, but there was a lot of fear on this problem, he said.
Farmers have protested various national capital borders for more than nine months, demanding to revoke three laws and also legal guarantees for MSP.
With the possibility of applying a new law in a phase, Ghanwat said, “Of course, we can,” but he refused to share if this was one of the recommendations of the committee.
Asked whether he planned to write a similar letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and handle ministers in the government, he said, “No.
Mandate for us is given by the Supreme Court.
We will only notify the court with the government about this.
The government pointed us Or we are responsible for that.
“Ghanwat also condemned Lathicharge about protesting farmers in Karnal, Haryana and said,” It shouldn’t happen.
Their request might not be true, but they have the right to show their views and protests.
“
Agriculture Law: Members of the designated panel SC said reported 100% supporting farmers
