Guwahati: All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) will move the Supreme Court to challenge Gauhati High Caleh’s assessment recently where the High Court enforces laws passed by Assembly Assam to close all state-funded madrasas and turn it into schools for general education .
The Secretary General of AIudf and Chief of Spokesman Aminul Islam said the assessment of the High Court upholding Act Assam Repealing 2020 was very unfortunate as “the law violated basic rights under Articles 14, 21, 25, 26, 28 and 30 of the Indian Constitution Minority society “.
He added that the action had also violated the basic structure of the constitution.
“India is a secular state.
The Constitution guarantees the rights equivalent to every citizen.
The state government has injured the idea of ​​secularism in this country.
AIUDF is left without other choices besides knocking on the door of the Supreme Court, seeking the protection of the basic rights of Muslim minorities, “He said.
Act Acsam Engealing 2020 was passed by Assam Assembly on December 30, 2020.
Then, the writing petition was submitted by 13 applicants before the Gautati High Court challenged the action.
The division bench consisting of chairman of Judge Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Soumitra Saikia, while rejecting the writing petition on Friday, said: “Executive order, which was under the challenge before us, has not been distributed with teacher services so far providing education in madrasas.
They will now be asked to teach Arabic or can even be trained to teach other subjects.
“The court observed,” we live in democracy and under the constitution of all citizens equal to law.
Therefore, preferences are given by the state for every religion, In multi-religious societies like us, eliminating the principle of Article 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution.
Thus the secular nature of the state whose mandates that there are no religious instructions provided in each educational institution that is fully maintained from state funds [Article 28 (1}] .
“P Court rejected the arguments made by Counsel Senior Applicant.
Advocate Sanjay Hegde sump WA Act Either and the next government “violates the basic rights of applicants based on article 25, 26, 28 and 30 Indian constitutions.”