PANAJI: The Bombay High Court in Goa on Tuesday showed a procedural problem in the Committee Constitution to investigate recruitment fraud allegedly in the Department of Public Works (PWD) and question the government over it.
The bench consisting of Judge Sadhana S Jadhav and Manish Pitale said they were “surprised” that the director of vigilance had signed an order on behalf of the governor and where he made himself a member of the Secretary of the Committee.
“What’s all this? …
How can he …
like Alice in Wonderland …
nominate yourself …” said the bench.
The bench asked the state government of why the command was not issued by the lessaturated and trying to find out whether the preliminary report should be submitted within 20 days after the appointment of the committee on December 29 was submitted.
Advocate General Devidas Pangam, who fell with Covid, told the High Court that he had not been touched for a week and could not go to the office.
The petition in job fraud was submitted by Godwin Pereira challenged the Constitutionality of the Act of the Goa Staff Election Commission (Amendment), 2021, and the next recruitment process began to suit it.
The applicant represented by Advocates Vibhav Amonkar asked the High Court whether the committee could also ask in the same deviation in various other departments where recruitment was held after the Amendment Act of the Goa Staff Election Commission, 2021, began to apply to request their own exam.
For posts.
The applicant is looking for catatist and setting aside the amendment of someone / committee is considered suitable by the High Court.
Amonkar said the amendment was defective and allowed each department to conduct an examination for recruiting the way they wanted.
Bench asked whether the problem had emerged after Ammar’s amendment said that if the recruitment must be carried out by the staff election commission itself, then it will ensure uniformity in the selection process.
Pangam begged with a high court not to give temporary commandments that direct the committee to ask the alleged recruitment in the department other than PWD, repeatedly said that the bench that requested an investigation of alertness by another department would be very “serious” and these things “sensitive”.
Pangam told the court that it was the government’s attitude that recruitment in other departments had occurred through an autonomous body.
The bench asked him what the committee needed to see recruitment in the PWD department.
Pangam said this because there was an accusation against the recruitment in the department and said he did not have the file and not in a position to answer court questions about what the accusation was.
He looked for time in this matter.