New Delhi: All Delhi except the Lutyens section has become a seller zone today, a Sad Delhi High Court said on Wednesday, adding that there was a “no political or executive will” to eliminate illegal vendors and vendors of city streets.
“Why does Lutyens reserve zone? Why should we be released? Let them come to Jalan Prithviraj, let them be in front of the President’s house, the High Court.
Why leave this area, we all have to deal with it,” HC said he was annoyed when Delhi’s police claimed it was The number of traders / vendors at Chandni Chowk made his best effort to remove it from the seller zone.
Judge Judge Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, who are checking if Vendor Street Act, 2014 vendors are too liked, are monitoring measures taken by the authorities to complete the construction work back at Chandni Chowk.
“If there is no political and executive will, then just let it be.
Why do we have to be disturbed? We get a complete feeling of defeat in this matter,” observing the court, while pulling the police and told the advice of the reason why the vendor was not removed was because they had to pay “Hafta”.
The court was hearing a request by Chandni Chowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal looking for instructions to the authorities to remove illegal vendors and vendors from areas that did not squat and not squatting.
“We have too much loose tip in the scheme, too many loose ends on the ground.
We need to find a permanent solution,” he added.
The bench noted, “People become accustomed to peddling even though it is a zone without hawking and does not need to be sold.
A large population is unemployed and they find it easier for Hawk and Congkan to meet their livelihood needs.” It added that the seller was recognized as Fundamental rights.
“But it must be arranged, so there is no litter, pedestrians getting a road on the sidewalk and Hawking stops being a nuisance, which is currently,” he said.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation is directed to immediately begin the preparation process of street vendors that experts from the planning field must be involved, including from school planning and architecture, IIT, PWD and other bodies.
The municipality was asked to submit a status report that showed the steps taken in this matter.
The court explained that the Civic body commissioner would be personally responsible for complying with this direction and registering a problem to hear on December 6, Sanjeev Ralli’s senior advocate told the court that even though there was a repeat direction for the installation of 330 cameras, none had been installed by the police.