New Delhi: Former JNU Student Leader JNU Umar Khalid, ordered under strict activity (prevention) and the allegations were “fertile imagination” to slander the movement.
During a fight about Plea Guarantee Khalid before the additional session judged Amitabh Rawatat, his advice, senior advocate Trideep Pais, said public opinion had been formed in a different way by the police selectively leaked Chargesheet and tried to create the impression that he was guilty.
Pais showed that Chargesheet claimed that previous experience of the main conspirator of the “half-grilled success and failure” two weeks ago made them realize that there was a need for secular, gender and media blankets.
He questioned whether it was wrong for women to protest.
“Will you take their right to protest because they are women or they are unable to protest? Does any movement must be driven by men?” He asked.
Drawing References to Harry Potter Villain Voldemort and Family Family Series, Pais questioned the basis of several charges against Khalid.
He asked whether the police officer entered Khalid’s mind to find out that when Delhi would be thrown into the fire, he would keep a safe distance to create the perfect alibi if the controversy was exposed.
“So, you don’t have evidence to connect it to crime …
The last person who enters a person is Voldemort at Harry Potter.
This police officer must have been in his mind to know this, or he must have a credible statement.
Nothing That said it.
Even even in Umar Khalid who bought a statement that was not signed, “said the senior advisor.
Calling the Chargesheet “rubbish”, Pais said such a statement entered the media and the media that was not responsible for treating it as evidence.
He asked how police officers took a view of CAA’s validity and whether it was acceptable or not.
“This chargesheet is not a chargesheet.
This is an exercise to slander people and brush them in the color of crime when there is no …
There is a reference repeatedly to the defendant to be communal, repeatedly drilling it to the head of everyone through this,” Advisory said, added that No one was accused.
Has been captured in this case.
The lawyer claimed none of the more than 700 witnesses said Khalid agreed to use social media and mobilization of young people to protest and chakka clock against CAA.
“If there is no basis for these facts and you put it in Chargesheet and the editor of you wrap it everyday, who communicated this country? Police,” Alleged Pais.
Mentioning that the protest against CAA / NRC is secular, but given communal colors, Pais accused, “It is almost like having a secular opposition to the wrong CAA.
The police accused that the conspirator exploited women.
Is a single woman to say she was exploited? Have they left and took a statement From women who protested? Nothing about guerrillas, no strategy.
“” Please see that he (police officer) did not write a family man’s manuscript.
He wrote a chargesheet.
If there is something that gives communal color, it is a chargesheet writer, “said Pais .