Categories: Allahabad

Allahabad HC Requires protection to Wed Girl and her live-in Spouse

PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad high court on Tuesday dismissed the security of a stay-at-home bunch, noticing that the girl was married and at a live-in connection with another guy.
“We don’t comprehend how such a request be permitted, allowing illegality from the society,” the high court detected while imposing a fine of Rs 5,000 over the bunch.
Petitioner number-one, Geeta, in Aligarh is a significant and can be at an live-in relationship with petitioner amount two, who’s a significant man.
At a writ petition filed before the high courtthey hunted leadership in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents Geeta’s husband and other relatives — to not hinder and interfere their’calm live-in relationship’ by embracing coercive steps.
While devoting their plea on June 15a division bench comprising Justice Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Justice Dinesh Pathak also dismissed the writ petition celebrating:”Could we grant security to the folks that wish to perpetrate what could be regarded as an act that’s contrary to the mandate of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Even the Article 21 of the Constitution of India may allow a individual to possess own freedom but the freedom needs to be in the ambit of regulation that applies to these.” The Article 21 of the Constitution gives security of life and personal freedom.
It ensures that no individual will be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by legislation.
The courtroom, while further noticing that the girl is the lawfully wedded spouse of a few of those respondents in the instance, commented:”She’s for whatever reasons chose to move away from her husband, so will we let them reside in regard below the guise of defense of liberty and life.” Significantly, the court observed that if her spouse had committed an action that may be regarded as an offence under Section 377 (supernatural offences) of Indian Penal Code (IPC) where she’s never complained of, and these are all contested questions of truth.
There’s not any FIR.
The court directed the fine levied on the petitioners will be deposited with them together with an Uttar Pradesh State Legal Services Authority.

news2in

Share
Published by
news2in

Recent Posts

44 ordered to attack the procession

Ludhiana: The police have submitted FIR to four identified and at least 40 unknown attackers…

2 years ago

Punjab: Police Reject conspiracy theory in the case of Deep Sidhu

Sonīpat / Ludhiana / Ambala: Actor Punjabi - Activist Activist Deep Sidhu, who died in…

2 years ago

Punjab: Hidden Strength Working Behind PM Narendra Modi, Arvind Kejriwal, said Rahul Gandhi

PATIALA / MANSA / BARNALA: Attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi and AAP National Convener Kejriawal,…

2 years ago

BJP made AAP to endanger the Congress, said Ajay

Jalandhar: BJP and AAM AAM AADMI parties are one party, Secretary General of the Ajay…

2 years ago

Our job is to make Punjab No. 1 State: Meenakshi Lekhi

Ludhiana: Minister of Union Culture Meenakshi Lekhi while campaigning to support the BJP candidate from…

2 years ago

Feb 20 is an opportunity to change the destiny of Punjab and his children: Bhagwant Mann

Machhiwara (Ludhiana): AAM AAM AADMI Party (AAP) Head of Punjab Candidate and Members of Parliament…

2 years ago