New Delhi: The day after India asked rich countries in the G20 to meet their own per capita emissions to the global average of 2030, a new study on Wednesday marked how many developed countries failed in their commitment with their groups, Including all G7 countries, the decline in reporting was only 3.7% in their greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in 1990 levels.
His first study in developing countries, carried out by the new Delhi Tank Tank Tank Board about energy, environment and water (CEE), may be an eye opening for all stakeholders who have stepped higher.
The mitigation target of all emitors includes India for the post-2020 period without actually seeing what historical pollutants did during their previous commitment period to 2020.
Although these countries together with developed countries in Sissr Estmana collectively decreased by 14, 8% in the 2019 target of 18% below the 1990 level, they emit a much higher carbon amount than what is expected during the period 2008-2020 – it means they consume ‘carbon space’ which can be available for developing and poor countries for development They need.
“There must be trust and trust in multilateral processes.
Therefore, it is important to remember and review what was promised in the pre-2020 period and whether they were conveyed,” said Richa Sharma, an additional secretary in environmental services that maintain the problem of climate change.
Make a statement in the virtual release function of this study, Sharma said, “Clear and non-biased assessment of the commitment and mitigation of pre-2020 and finance is their needs.” This study seeks to clearly describe the performance of developed countries in the previous commitment period (2008-12 and 2013–2020).
Phew with this study also released ranked 43-developed countries based on their sincerity on climate action and mitigation efforts carried out in the Pre-2020 climate regime.
Sweden, England, Belgium and Denmark topped the list while other major economies such as the US, Canada, Australia and Russia appeared at the bottom in terms of their pre-2020 actions.
The CEEC study highlights that US non-participation in the commitment period (2008-12 and 2013-2020) has some adverse effects on global climate action, including the withdrawal of other developed countries from the Kyoto protocol.
In addition to our biggest historical emitter, three other big pollutants – Canada, Russia and Japan – have also missed climate actions under one or both period commitments.
“Emissions from non-participating countries contributed 47% of emissions from all developed countries between 2008-12.
This figure rose to 71% between 2013-20,” said this research – ‘dismantling the Pre-2020 climate commitment: what delivered, what Many, and how will the gap be handled? ‘ In the background of the poor performance of the rich state in reducing their promised carbon footprint during the pre-2020 period, the CEE of Cee Arunabha Ghosh said, “While all countries must consider increasing ambitions, the load promises that are not forced and the use of carbon space that is not Proportional cannot fall in developing countries (for post-2020 actions).
” India, in fact, caused this problem during the MINISTER G20 meeting last week, set tones for developing countries in front of the 26th session from the UN Climate Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, England in November where the pre-2020 actions and financial mobilization Adequate for climate action will dominate the discourse.
“We must ensure that history does not repeat itself, and that countries work together to effectively overcome climate change.
Our hope is that our evaluation of past efforts will inspire greater leadership, trust and transparency in climate negotiations in the future Home, starting with COP26, starting with COP26, “Shikha Bhasin said, leading a senior program, CEE.
He said, “It is very important to ensure a fair, fair, and prosperous future.
For example, countries that sit from the Pre-2020 commitment period can compensate by buying unspled (CERS) certified emission reductions or voluntarily cancel Unproduced carbon allowances.
“