Prasagraj: Refusing the Second Anticipatory Assurance Application from someone, who allegedly used pasteed bed / degree forged to get a job, the High Court of Allahabad had observed that “anticipatory guarantee to be extraordinary drugs, must be carried out in only a special case..” Reject anticipatory guarantee From one Kumar Hemant, justice Samit Gopal took a serious record of the accusations flattened to the applicant and was observed, “by the Petitioner Law seeking appointment based on Marksheet / Title which is placed, one candidate who deserves loss of seats and opportunities in the appointment and it might lose losses For many reasons such as crossing the specified age bracket and many other factors.
“A pine was submitted against the Petitioner at the MANth Police Station, Mathura District below Section 420 (cheating) and other parts of the Indian Criminal Code (IPC), accused the applicant Beneficiaries of fake passenger sheets, the ones He didn’t go.
Universitas Agra, showed him to fulfill the terms of inspection of beds in the 2004-05 academic session.
Reduce applications for anticipatory assurance, the court observed, “The Prima Facie case shows the applicant’s involvement in the questions because it is a beneficiary by utilizing a false marksheet / degree.
The applicant has not specifically specifically.
The situation.
There is no reason found falsely involving the current applicants .
“the court also rejected the mainland parity proposed by the applicant, said,” As far as orders are concerned that someone else has given assurance assurance / interaction interim, the same is not binding on this court.
” Referring to the rejection of the first anticipatory guarantee by the High Court, the court in the order of December 21 said, “While rejecting the application of the first anticipatory guarantee, the court argues that during the investigation, sometimes, the interrogation custodian might be needed to achieve the root of evil, the same thing is not Can be ignored.
Therefore, looking into gravity violations, the nature of violations and the legal position mentioned above, this court believes that the anticipatory guarantee application has no services and is responsible for rejection.
“