Prasagraj: Refusing the Second Anticipatory Assurance Application from someone, who allegedly used pasteed bed / degree forged to get a job, the High Court of Allahabad had observed that “anticipatory guarantee to be extraordinary drugs, must be carried out in only a special case..” Reject anticipatory guarantee From One Hemant Kumar @ Hemant Kumar Saraswat, Justice Samit Gopal took a serious record of the accusations flattened to the applicant and was observed, “by the Petitioner Law seeking appointments / degrees, one worthy candidate has lost seating and the opportunity to design and it is possible lifelong loss for various reasons such as crossing the specified age bracket and many other factors.
“A pine was put forward against the Petitioner at the MANth Police Station, Mathura District under Section 420 (cheating) and other parts of the Indian Criminal Code (IPC), Accepting the applicant is the beneficiary of fake passenger sheets, He thought he was headed.
Universitas Agra, showed him to fulfill the terms of inspection of beds in the 2004-05 academic session.
Reduce applications for anticipatory assurance, the court was observed, “The Prima Facie case shows the involvement of the applicant in question-in-question because it is a beneficiary by utilizing a false sign / degree.
The applicant has not set a special state.
There is no reason found falsely involving the Applicant this.
“the court also rejected the mainland parity proposed by the applicant, said,” As far as orders are concerned that someone else has given assurance assurance / interaction interim, the same is not binding on this court.
” Referring to the rejection of the first anticipatory guarantee by the High Court, the court in the order of December 21 said, “While rejecting the application of the first anticipatory guarantee, the court argues that during the investigation, sometimes, the interrogation custodian might be needed to achieve the root of evil, the same thing is not Can be ignored.
Therefore, look into gravity violations, the nature of violations and the legal position mentioned above, this court believes that anticipatory guarantee applications have no benefits and can be rejected.
“