New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday sends hard messages to all client-impressive advocates: “Do not submit a voluminous request to terrorize the judges and the risk of getting a postponed hearing”.
Find it hard to pass 51-volume appeal, each walked to more than 100 pages, submitted by Indian broadcasts and digital foundations on HC bombing assessments that rejected the petition challenging the order of new tariffs Telecommunications (NTO 2.0), a bench from CJI NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant, “The SC involves a truck to bring the volume of this appeal to the judge considering to allow them to read it and get ready with this problem.” “You can’t terrorize us by submitting a volume and volume of appeal.
In this case, there are 51 volumes in one petition.
You sit together and submit a short short volume that provides a synopsis of the problem that will be decided,” he said.
Advocate Darius Khatchatta, Neeraj Krayan Kiss, Gopal Jain and Amit Sibal, who appeared for the applicant.
The bench was booked, “We direct the senior advisor to apply to make the comfort volume of all the documents and circulate the same.” It was postponed the trial on August 18.
The bench faces a similar situation in the appeal submitted by Amazon and Flipkart on the decision of Karnataka HC which allows anti-manifestative investigations to these companies by the Indian competition commission.
“Again the volume and volume of the petition are submitted.
We know it to terrorize us,” he said.
APEX court: Don’t terrorize a judge with a broad petition
