New Delhi: The leader of the Senior Congress P Chidambaram on Wednesday questioned the Ayodhya Supreme Court verdict and said it was “not the right assessment”.
“Because of the passage of time, both parties accepted it (ayodhya verdict).
Because both parties have accepted it, it becomes the right judgment, not the other way around.
This is not the right assessment received by both parties,” Chidamabram said.
Ayodhya’s decision was a round decision given on November 9, 2019.
Former Minister of Union spoke at the launch of the Salman Khurshid Congress leader of the new book ‘Sunrise Over Ayodhya: Nationality in our day’.
The book, made provocative information on the hindutva and equalized ideology to those followed by ISIS or Boko Haram.
It has triggered a political controversy with BJP who accused the Congress “trying to legitimize ISIS radical elements by creating Hindu equality”.
Congress Salman Khurshid in his new book wrote that the Hindutva was similar to the Islamic groups of jihadists such as …
https://t.co/lyhjikyxvs- Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) 1636548630000Talking about his book, Khurshid said: “That is my responsibility for Explain the court ruling that is associated.
I agree, it is a very good assessment, how to apply ointment to the situation we have in this country and effort to ensure that something like this does not happen again.
“Chidambaram, who does not seem to agree with this view, said: “What happened on December 6, 1992, it was very wrong.
It was demeaning our constitution.
After SC assessment, things took predictable courses, within one year or more of each person accused of being released.
So like no one killed Jessica, no one destroyed Babri Mosque.
“Because of the passage of time, both parties accepted it (ayodhya verdict).
Because both parties have accepted it, it becomes the right judgment, not vice versa.
This is not the right assessment received by the two parties received by Chidambaram “the conclusion will be forever we haunt us, that in the country of Jawaharlal Nehru, Mahatma Gandhi, APJ Abdul Kalam …
and after 75 years of independence, we were not ashamed to say it was not there which destroys Babri Mosque, “he added.
“Whatever Gandhiji thinks is ‘Ramrajya’ no longer ‘Ramrajya’ understood by many people.
What Pandit Ji tells us about secularism is not secularism understood by many people.
Securities have moved from acceptance to tolerance, and from tolerance to the coexistence Uncomfortable, “said Former Minister of Finance Union.
Congress leader Digvijaya Singh also spoke on the show and said: “Hindutva has nothing to do with Hinduism.
Savarkar is not religious.
He said why cows were considered ‘maata’ and had no problems consuming beef.
He brought the word ‘hindutva’ to set identity Hindus that causes confusion in people.
“” When BJP was locked in only two seats in 1984, they decided to make Ram Janmbhoomi connect national problems as socialism of Gandhian Atal Bihari Vajpayee failed in 1984.
So they were forced to walk on Jalan Hardcore, Fundamentalism The fanatical religion with RSS and its ideology is known.
Advani Ji Yatra is the person who divides the community.
He sowed the seeds of hatred wherever he left, “he said.
Ayodhya’s verdict was accepted by both parties and became the right assessment: Chidambaram
