New Delhi: As an advocate continues to strike and bring the sending system of justice to stop with various assessments of the Supreme Court, the Indian Bar Board has now decided to punish the lawyer and told the Supreme Court on Friday this halam will be framed.
Appearing in front of Judge Dy Chandrachud and Mr.
Shah, Chairman of the Indian Bar Board, Manan Mishra, told the court that the meeting of all the State Bar Board had been held on September 4 to discuss this issue and the rules would be resolved in the first week of next month.
Echoing court sentiment that has repeatedly argues that lawyers that occur in the strike / boycott court cannot be justified with the rights of the right to freedom of speech and expression because it affects the entire justice system and violates the right to fairly guaranteed justice under the constitution, Mishra tells the bench The rules will make provisions to punish people for provoking lawyers on social media to strike.
The Indian Council Bar, the peak legal entity to arrange a lawyer, said that it would place before the court draft rules for his approval.
BCI approved the frame regulation after being driven by the APEX court which requested that it remained a mute audience when advocates behave in an unprofessional and inappropriate way, “seriously note about the fact that even though there was a decision in this court, still so.
The lawyer’s association continues to be beaten , We took the awareness of Suo Moto and issued a notification to the Indian Bar Board and all the Council of the State Bar to suggest further action and to provide real advice to deal with the problem of strike / abstain to work by lawyers, “said the APEX court when issuing notice.
The court has said that the judiciary as an institution is unable to have a lawyer frequently strikes and say, “If the lawyer will work in those days, it will be a greater interest and it will achieve the final goal of justice, which is now recognized as rights Fundamental under Article 14 and 21 Constitution.
It will help in the initial disposal of criminal trials and therefore will be the interests of those who languish in prison and wait for their trial to conclude “.