Kolkata: The West Bengal Bar Board has written to the Chairman of the Indian Judge, looking for the immediate elimination of Calcutta High Cale Cale Judge Rajesh Bindes, to maintain “noble and sanctity” from the oldest charter trial in the country.
“We, members of the West Bengal Bar Association, were forced to write this instant letter in an urgency of urgency and terrible,” the Bar Board of the West Bengal Chairman Ashok Kumar Deb wrote to CJI NV Ramana, called for the elimination of bindal judges, referring to several examples, which raises “perception That he is a judge who is unfair, partially and biased and whose continuation in the Hon’ble High Court interferes with fair and impartial justice dispensation “.
Deb, a lawyer, is also MLA six times from Budge Budge, five times as a Trinamool Congress candidate.
The body of 26 members, which enrolled all state advocates, also had Trinamool Rajya Sabha MP and members of the KMC administrator, among its members.
“What we are looking for is justice and neutrality.
We understand this unprecedented (in Bengal) but we cannot wait for any more mute,” Deb said to Ti.
In the letter dated June 25, citing the way the Narada case was handled, Deb claimed Dibinal behavior showed that he “did not pay attention to Judicial Compliance and had committed judicial conscience”.
On May 24, Judge Arinda Sinha had written a letter, where he took a serious exception in a way in which Narada guarantee material was handled by Bench Division.
Deb mail refers to this too.
The material of the Narada case is currently heard by five judges headed by Justice Bindal.
“The fact that the five judges headed by Justice Bindal had allowed demand repeatedly by the CBI to submit a written statement, but had refused requests made by Mamata Banerjee [Minister of Chief Justice [Law] to submit Affidavits and contests where serious accusations It has been done against them is a clear sign of biased bindal, “Deb said.
Hearing the appeal by Banerjee and Ghatak, the Supreme Court on Friday has asked Calcutta HC to receive fresh applications from them and hear their requests on June 29 in the Narada case, putting aside the calculation of June 9 June 9 which rejected their written statement.
Deb also refers to the case that Banerjee cm was put forward before HC, challenged Suvendu Adhikari’s victory in the election of the assembly of Nandigram.
The problem was initially submitted and mentioned before the single bench headed by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharya but the Bindal justice then assigned this problem for Chanda’s causic justice “while fully and fully aware of the Justice Chanda relationship with BJP”, the letter said.
“The chairman of justice, becoming a list of lists, is expected to carry out the highest justice judge standards.
However, the actions and behavior of Bindal Judges prove the opposite.
This is a serious problem that formal applications are made before the bindal judge to assign the problem to the court besides Justice Chanda.
However, There are no steps taken on the Bindal Judge.
More surprisingly, this problem continues before Hon’ble Justice Chanda.
“” We beg your vaginal discharge to take a direct step to eliminate Rajesh Dibsy’s justice as the Calcutta High Court judge so that the majesty and the sanctity of the High Court is enforced And to ensure the trust of the community on the judiciary does not fall into pieces.
Unless the urgent steps are taken for the elimination of Rajesh Bindal justice, we will be a mute audience for sustainable justice parody in the hands of prejudiced judges, bias and tilting and justice will be on Reject for this great citizen, “the letter added.
The letter also attracted a sharp response.
Senior Advocates and CPM Rajya Sabha MP Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya said: “The chief who is the author of this letter should know the jurisdiction of the office he puja.
He did not have the authority to write the annoying letter to demean state practice lawyers.
His letter totaled interference with the administration of justice, “Add.
“I will ask for the main justice of India to start the insults of Suo Motu continuing the author of the letter.” “As a legal entity for advocates, we remain in our rights to find a fair and neutical justice dispense,” Deb replied.