Patna: amid rumors about the steps for fresh amendments in the provisions of the Law of the Prohibition captured at the Crossfires after the frequent HOOCH death, the main opposition party, RJD, on Tuesday claimed that it would move the motion of not confidence in the government in the session The budget if the proposed amendment does not become the interests of the people or in harmony with its principles.
The last amendment to the ban on the ban was carried out in 2018 to free someone who was caught drinking liquor for the first time at the payment of a fine of RS50,000.
However, it was put into a delay.
According to a new report that has not been confirmed, the proposed amendment has been debated by the State Excise and the Department of Prohibition and sent to the House Department for permission to pave the way for final supervision and approval by the Law Department.
Next, it will get a cabinet nodding for amendments in the upcoming budget session.
However, the Deputy CM Tarkishore Prasad on Tuesday denied the proposal.
“There is no proposal at the NDA level for the legal amendment of the ban.
All NDA is united in supporting it,” Prasad told MediaPonpon, almost reversing the Stand of the BJP President of the State Dr.
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, who has called for a review of the provisions.
While reminded of the request by the leader of Hindustan Awam Morcha (secular) Jitan Ram Manjhi for his review, Prasad said, “He is like our guardian and his party is also an important component of NDA.
What he said is a suggestion.” Incidentally, in the light of the report that has not been Confirmed about the government spokesman likely the government, HAM (S) Denmark Rizwan said that the amendments that try to be discussed must be discussed in public and, if people support, the law must be revoked.
As for RJD, Senior Mla Bhai Birendra also took a relatively strong line.
“If the proposed amendment is not for the benefit of the people or in harmony with the principles of our party, we will bring the motion of not confidence in the government,” he said.
It immediately put BJP and JD (U) on offensive.
BJP member Rajya Sabha Sushil Kumar Modi challenges RJD to announce that it will revoke the ban on the ban.
A spokesman JD (U) Neeraj Kumar also said: “I do not know what they will do (read RJD) in the future.
They must bring the movement not confident to the legal ban itself, ask for their revocation.
Then, they will know what People think about the law.
“Meanwhile, it was said that the possibility of amendments was intended to overcome the worries of the Supreme Court and the High Court regarding a dramatic increase in cases related to disreed liquor in the state court.
The APEX court has observed that the law was made without anticipating additional side effects in the future and, therefore, the Practical Prohibition Act resulted in waste of court time carefully to hear guaranteed petitions, in addition to detention.
People under various provisions that have risen and are beyond prison capacity in the state to hold.
In accordance with the rumor, the government contemplates dividing offenses in two ordinary groups (consumers of liquor, which are related to drunk or drinks) and serious violations (manufacturers of liquor, suppliers).
Furthermore, the provisions regarding the foreclosure of the vehicle will also be attended by allowing them to be released on payment of fines to be repaired.
Likewise, the provisions will be made to release people accused of ordinary violations after payment of fine, which, in turn, is expected to reduce the number of cases related to a liquor by 40% of the total.
However, general points in which the two ruling and opposition parties have been hammered are that those who are arrested and charged for committing bad crimes and the majority of them are also included in the worse part.
Therefore, the quantum of fine to repair will be an additional annoying problem, feels.