Letter: The table turns on the manufacturer of additional textile products after the court holds it from using a trademark for its products that he takes his relatives made from the court by filing a trademark against him.
Antail Gonawala Applicants, who produce and sell lace, ribbons, buttons, pins, and needles among other products, have filed a trademark lawsuit in October 2016 against Jitendra Jariwala, which also produces and sells the same products as the brand name ‘Bright’.
The gonawala has claimed that he has used the brand name for its products since 1990 and Jarakala then began producing the same product using the same brand name.
He asked the court to hold Jariwala from using a brand name for one of his products and was ordered to pay the amount of Rs 300 as damage.
However, things related to ‘bright’ began to become ‘dark’ for the gonawala when the court realized that his intention was only to harass his relatives after he could not produce evidence that he was a trademark holder during the court process during the process.
, Jariwala has never been crossed during hearing there is also no evidence conveyed by the company denied by the Gonawala.
In fact, after this problem was set for trial, the gonawala and his advocate never appeared before the Court.
“, He opposed it because the Gonawala application was abandoned.
He also claimed that the Gonawala had filed a lawsuit only to harass and extort money from him.
Last week, the District Additional Court and Judge V and Mapara session to enforce the claim of Jarwala and argued that the lawsuit was reckless gonawala.
The court said that the gonawala has no right to use a trademark of ‘bright’ or other identical or similar trademarks for products that are also produced and sold by Jaringwala.
He was also asked not to cause a barrier to Jariwala in using the trademark ‘Bright’.
The next court asked for a petition not only To bear the cost of my own litigation, but also pay fees borne by Jariwala.