Mumbai: it holds that no useful goals will be served if the first strike continued after the defendant and victim, 25, married to each other in March 2020 in the Raigad district two months after he stayed, the High Court canceled joint approval.
HC bench from Prasana Varale and Anil Kior judge on January 3, also noted that SC made it “it was clear that the court could not refuse to bend fir, only because FIR combines certain provisions which are serious violations or violations of the community.” Advocate Ganesh Gupta Because the defendant pointed to a statement of the woman who said since he had now resolved his case and married him, he wanted to drop charges.
He personally attended the court and to a query from the bench again firmly that he wanted to bend fir it voluntarily.
He said he was friends with the defendant and his physical relationship since 2019 with him “consensual”, “not forced” and the cage was asked because of “misunderstandings”.
HC after hearing the additional public prosecutor KV Saste said, “It is true that violations – under the 376 part of the IPC are serious and is a violation of the community.
As a result, the crime cannot be canceled by approval,” but quoted the 2014 SC in power, And said, “The Court must try to find out whether FIR does reveal the ingredients of the violation and that the court can accept settlements and cancel firs if the court argues that such violations do not need to be included in the accusation sheet,” said the command authorized by the court.
(The identity of the victim has not yet been disclosed to protect His privacy as a directory of the Supreme Court in cases related to sexual violence)