Letter: Twelve years ago, he set an example of being an honest citizen by not drinking the head of the principal of a grant in school grant-assistance with Rs 500 for the form of receipt and notifying the anti-corruption agency (ACB).
However, the table changed last week for Pravin Mahajan when head head, Patil Bhavsaheb, was released but the complainant himself ended at the dock as a ‘honest’ picture stained.
Incidentally even when all witnesses including material witnesses, the officers who investigated standing firmly on their testimony, Mahajan turned hostile during the experiment, but the twist and patil were released.
The court, however, held Mahajan responsible for Patji and issued a notification of the show to him asking him to explain why he did not have to be punished and stated that all prosecution cases had failed because the complainant himself had been hostile.
The court also observed that “complainants changed hostility in the criminal process had become a threat”.
“There is plenty of public time, money and resources consumed with every single complaint submitted, until it reaches the logical conclusion by the court., All because the complainants have chosen to move the criminal engine.
However, the complainants change hostility at their sweet will.
This is not Only affects the course of justice but also causes extraordinary waste from the general time, money and resources …
one day they filed complaints and the next day they were hostile to.
The entire legal system was joked by people like that.
(Sic), “the court stated in his assessment.
In May 2009, ACB had put a trap for Patil’s NAB because Mahajan complained about him who demanded bribes.
Mahajan accused Patil initially demanded a 1,000 rs bribe to give a form of receipt for his cousin.
After initial negotiations, the number of bribes was repaired at the RS 500 and Mahajan approached ACB because he did not want to pay bribes.
Bribe whistle-blower on the dock for Patji
