Mumbai: observing that only because community affairs handled by committee members, a builder cannot free him if there is a wrong construction, the court session has decided to support Bhandup CHS and uphold the court court for complaints to complaints of construction below.
The session court said the judge was correctly observed that there was a case of the prime facie to show negligence in the section of the builder that could endanger human life and personal safety.
“The net is affixed to protect the damage to life and the property is clear of the photo produced.
The plaster that comes not because of wear and torn, but because of debonding in the block, which is a problem related to construction,” he said.
‘Placester pieces fall from the balcony when building only old years, CHS has transferred the judge court in 2018 which accused that some of the seven-year-old development was on the verge of collapsing.
It quotes two examples from 2017, when the plaster pieces from two balconies fall.
Allegedly that two cars were damaged and losses were pegged at Rs 2,15 lakh.
The next community said that the audit report carried out by well-known companies and an expert showed large cracks, leaks and seepage which were seen even to the naked eye.
Last year, the Magistrate Court has published a process of City Developers Ltd., director and four others.
The complaint was submitted by CHS chairman, who has submitted that the builder has developed a commercial housing building consisting of 108 flats, and buyers are in the building since 2011.
The community said the builder was needed to form a community and registered, but had failed.
It is suspected that construction is a sub-standard because the material used is inferior quality.
Complaints are also delayed before the National Consumer Sydressal Commission.
CHS said it was feared for the safety of its inhabitants.
The complaint was submitted under the part of the Indian criminal section associated with endangering the life or personal safety of others and general intentions.
Maximum sentence based on costs imprisoned for up to three months or a fine that can be extended to Rs 250, or both.
However, the builder and officials, denied the allegations and said since 2014, the building was managed by residents and their committees, and therefore they were responsible for maintenance.
They said the complaint was submitted to harass and extract money.
Builder Responsible for Shoddy Work: Mumbai Court
