New Delhi: In the world today, can a 16-year-old girl forced by the court to interact with her mother when she felt safe with her father and did not want to talk to her mother, the SC asked Mother based in the US accused her husband who was tamped with poison The thoughts of his two daughters after secretly escaping with them to India, report Dhananjay Mahapatra.
Appeared for the mother belonging to the Parsi community, senior advocate Sidharth Luthra said the daughters were only 15 and 13 when her husband fled with them in 2019 after guaranteeing the US court, where he filed a divorce lawsuit in 2017, that he would return in two weeks.
Because her husband fled to India with her daughter in 2019, has become a struggle for mothers even talking to her daughter by telephone or video call, said Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra.
Appearing for a husband, encouraging Sidharth Bhatnagar, told the court that one of the daughters had reached the age of majority and was studying abroad while others were now 16 years old.
Because they don’t want to interact with mothers, there are few husbands.
Can do, he said.
A bench said, “The youngest girl is 16 years old …
Anyone who is 16 years or more, decides what is good for him.
You think a father can teach a 16-year-old child?” The court also asked the mother how many times she tried to interact with her daughter last year.
“We cannot hold their hands and force them to interact with their mothers.
The court can only decide whether children have made a conscious decision,” Bench LED Cji said and asked the husband whether he could arrange videoconferencing with the daughters.
Bhatnagar said there was no order to be passed and he would set it voluntarily on Wednesday.
Last year, Bombay HC too, after interacting with the two daughters, had refused the woman’s request for prisoners of children.