New Delhi: In the world today, a 16-year-old girl can be forced by the court to interact with her mother when she felt safe with her father and did not want to talk to her mother, the Supreme Court asked us based in the United States who accused her husband to poison the second thought His daughter after quietly escaping with them to India.
Appearing for Mothers based in the US-owned by the Parsi community, Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra said that new daughters were 15 and 13 years old when her husband fled with their daughter to India in August 2019 after ensuring a US court, where she submitted a court, at where he has arched divorce lawsuit in 2017, that he will return in two weeks.
Since then it has become a struggle for mothers even talking to his daughter by telephone or video calls, Lutra complained.
Appearing for husband, senior advocate Sidharth Bhatnagar told the court that one of the daughters had reached the age of majority and was studying abroad while other girls were now 16 years old.
Because they don’t want to interact with the mother, there is a little husband who can do this, he said.
Chairman of the Judge NV Ramana and Judge as Bopanna and Hya Kohli said, “The youngest girl is 16 years old.
In the world today, anyone who is 16 years or more, decides what is good for her.
You think a father can a father tutor a child aged 16 years? “The court also asked the mother how many times she tried to interact with her daughter last year.
“We cannot hold their hands and force him to interact with their mothers.
The court can only decide whether children have made a conscious decision,” Bench Led Cji said and asked the husband whether he could arrange a meeting of video conferencing with two daughters.
Bhatnagar said there was no order to be passed and he would set it voluntarily on Wednesday.
Even Bombay HC, after interacting with both women, has said assessment on March 24 last year rejected the US-based maternal request for prisoners.
That said, “We argue that even though the applicant is the mother of children, that alone cannot be a factor to give demands in his help.
The women have been in India now for a better part of three years.
And one of the princesses will soon be Reaching the age of majority.
“” Taking the overall view of the facts of this case, we argue that it will be the best interests of the Petitioner’s daughters and their father, that the prayers made on behalf of the Petitioner in this Writ Petition are not given..
..
we can not persuade themselves to adhering to the daughters were in the custody of improper or illegal from the Father.
there is no doubt about the fact that this judgment is, that we have revealed, can not have any effect on true that the applicant may assert in connection with princess prisoners in the right process, which must be decided according to the law, “HC said while giving the mother right to visit His daughter in India, the cost that will be borne by her isolated husband.