Patna is the case of blatant legal abuse, Patna police arrested a woman who suffered from cancer in the day he was given anticipatory guarantee in almost similar fraud cases together with the same retired IPS Officer as the same police station with the police station with the police station The same as the same police station with the defendant’s police station and her husband.
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava submitted the first officer on January 19 and the second on June 6 this year against Ajeet Kumar and his wife Sangeeta Srivastava with the Gardanibagh police station in the city, alleged that he had given a loan to Rp97.8 lakh as a loan to the pair between February and June 2019 for the treatment of Sangeeta cancer.
The complainant accused when asked for payment, Ajeet gave him seven separate checks and all bounced.
The only substantial difference between the two firs is that the second mention five additional checks issued in March and April this year while the two previous examinations of RS10 Lakh and RS3 Lakh were signed by Ajeet on September 17, 2020.
Significantly, Ajeet died of Covid At a private hospital on May 4, before the second FIR was submitted against it.
He is a truck and bus dealer and also has a gas station.
The District Court and Judge Patna session provided anticipatory guarantee to Sangeeta on June 30 in the first case with observations that criminal liability for non-esteemed checks issued by dead husbands could not be shifted to the applicant, who suffered cancer.
Most importantly, the court also observed that any violation under Section 138 of the instrument laws negotiated could not be investigated by the police because they were under the Special ACT.
However, Sangeeta was arrested from the residence of Patel Nagar on June 30 itself and was forwarded to detention in the next day after production before the Acjm Court Amlesh Kumar Singh.
When asked, Patna SSP upendra Kumar Sharma said the wisdom of the advanced court for prison and who was not in the case.
“However, I will look in the first direction and see what evidence is there for the woman,” he added.
Pradeep first alleged that the couple took the RS77.8 Lakh loan from him between February and June in 2019.
He alleged that the check for RS10 Lakh and RS3 Lakh on September 17, 2020 was released by Ajeet but this was insufficient because it was insufficient.
Balancing in a bank account.
This FIR is listed under Section 406 and 420 IPC and section 138 of this law.
In the second FIT, Pradeep was suspected that Ajeet issued three checks for RS5 Lakh, RS9.8 Lakh and RS10 lakh on April 9, one RS11.22 Lakh examination on April 13 in his name and another check for RS20 Lakh on March 28 in his wife Name Kiran Srivastava, but all this is also not honored because of insufficient balance.
The additional part of 34 IPC was called in the second FIR.
In both fire, a copy of the Toi, Pradeep accused that the couple was his relatives and they came to his home in January 2019 and asked RS1 Crore as a loan for Sangeeta’s care and other financial problems.
Pradeep accused him of giving RS77.8 lakh and RS20 Lakh on a separate occasion of his savings and taking loans from friends and relatives.
When asked, the Gardanibagh police station Sho Arun Kumar said it was forgery and cheating problems.
“The couple was accused of taking loans, not paying back and did not respect the post-date examination,” he said.
However, he failed to answer how Sangeeta was arrested because of the occupied check issued by her dead husband.
“This is the problem of investigation.
This problem before the court must decide,” he said.
Sangeeta’s advisor Shama Sinha and Rashid Zafar accused him of being arrested at night and managed.
“The time of the arrest mentioned in the memo is 10:30 a.m..
The police officer does not use a signboard,” they said.
Sho said it was a lie that he was arrested at night.
“We caught it at 4 pm,” he said.
Cancer patients are held even if we get a guarantee in a similar case
