New Delhi: “We cannot let the city go to the dogs, we are here to protect the rule of law,” said the Delhi High Court who was not happy on Wednesday, warned the state government and city authorities over the increasing number of unauthorized roads .
vendor.
Judge Vipin Sanghi and Jasmet Singh said while Delhi was constantly, the population continued to increase – “it exploded” on the stitches – and wondering how many vendors would be permitted by authority.
When advocate Rahul Mehra told the high court the solution will be found in the next three months, he shot back: “Forget about three months, three months is too long, even one day …” The court further recorded it always said it recognizes vendors and vendors as an important part of the economic system.
Even though vendors have rights, there is no absolute right, he said, adding, “We are here to protect the rule of law.
(IT) does not mean you only see a constituency and say it, ‘Look at their rights there, they need to be protected ‘” HC said he would check not only the 2014 action, but the rules and schemes flowed from him.
It quotes the status of Connaught Place and says it is a no-hawking zone and no-vending, but the vendor has a day after day.
“When you allow them (vendors), you allow them in a way that is not regulated that today the market has lost its character …
There are 10 vendors sitting outside the store and customers cannot enter because there are problems with cleanliness and order.” HC said that.
“Every time you find Delhi images, iconic buildings and iconic places, you find CP or Qutub Minar.
That’s how you describe Delhi.
And it’s very convenient you don’t even need to have representatives from the CP association on TVC on TVC on TVC on TVC on TVC.
That is why we take your guarantee with a little salt, “said the High Court.