New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday agreed to examine the former Minister of Union Minister M J Lol against the court order recognizing the journalist Priya Ramani in the case of defamation over alleged sexual abuse.
“Recognize.
The list in time,” said Justice Mukta Gupta who had issued a notice to Ramani for the appeal in August last year.
Lawyer Bhavook Chauhan appeared for Ramani before the court and sought time to submit a response to the Akbar’s request.
Senior Advocate Rajiv Nark, representing Akbar, was submitted that he was not looking for temporary commandments in this matter when the request challenged the release and urged the court to recognize the appeal.
Judge Gupta stated that the complainant had the right to appeal and claim to be the same.
Senior Advocate Geeta Luthra also appeared for Akbar.
In his appeal, Akbar has argued that the court court decided the criminal defamation case on the basis of allegations and allegations and as if it was a case of sexual abuse.
“The court court has been mistaken in considering instant cases as complaints for sexual harassment when it is actually a complaint for defamation …
The court must consider the evidence presented by respondents (Ramani) here from the perspective of defamation cases as respondents do not provide evidence Acceptable Corroboratory, besides his own testimony, “the appeal said.
Akbar also claimed that the court court was “wrong wrong” in observing that he did not have a star’s reputation and had ignored the principles of established criminal jurisprudence.
The request was argued that the trial court while passing the judgment “relied on” Ramani’s fight that Akbar was not a man from a reputation of a star and perfect, “who speaks the volume of non-applying the mind, while giving a revenge assessment, rendering the same as bad law.” The court court has refused the complaints submitted by Akbar, saying no accusations proved to be against Ramani.
It was said from a view that the grand case of the violation commission could be punished under section 500 (punishment for violations of defamation) IPC against Ramani was not proven and he was released for the same thing.
Case of defamation: HC to hear Akbar’s request on Ramani Weather
