Patna: A large number of people who are now moving to the Supreme Court just to get their case including the guarantee issues listed in front of the Patna High Court as the mention they are not accepted given the urgent things to hear or wait long to hear or wait long.
It drains Wangigants from their valuable time and resources.
The High Court has not been able to start functioning in complete physical mode but even after more than one and a half years.
Only took the urgent case to hear from mid-March, 2020 because of the Pandemic Covid-19.
This condition has increased the fat case before the High Court functions with the power of the drained judge.
The High Court began working in virtual mode on March 19 last year.
It continues to work in the same mode for several months.
It tried to reopen in hybrid mode with the studio field where the judges sat in one courtroom and lawyer elsewhere but functions in this mode only for some time.
It returned to switch to virtual mode completing earlier this year due to the second wave of pandemic.
It still works in virtual mode complete and takes up most cases urgent.
The most recent to get assistance from the Supreme Court is Kamladiyyta Construction Private Limited which has been included by the state government for 10 years.
The company moved to a high court but the problem was not taken to hear remembering it was not urgent.
Finally moved the Supreme Court where the full reading bench RF Nariman, Navin Sinha, and Indira Banerjee benefited it on August 11 provided desired assistance.
The bench observed that the company’s problem was very urgent and asked Patna High Court to take it earlier.
“We believe that the High Court will pay attention to this, and at least, pass the temporary order at the direct petition submitted by the applicant,” SC was observed.
The Apex court was told that there was a tender to be opened soon and the applicant’s company could not participate because of the blacklist.
One Rajesh Kumar had to move a mere SC to get a guarantee petition anticipate registered to hear before the High Court.
On June 4, the SC division bench from Judge Indira Banerjee and Shah directed the High Court to consider Kumar’s prayer to hear the safety of his anxiety earlier within three weeks from the date of the order.
Another example is Om Prakash Dhanuka who moved to the APEX court when his anxiety trial petition was not registered here even after his advice request repeatedly.
After hearing his complaint, the full bench of NV Ramana’s justice (now CJI) with Judge Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose on March 23 this year asked the High Court to make anticipatory assurance application Dhanuka and throw it in a week.
Arbitration problems between M / S Dwivedi and Sons and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited are waiting for hearing before a high court for a long time and not considered to hear.
The Bench Division of Judge Vineet Suggestions and Dinesh Maheshwari at the Supreme Court ordered the High Court on August 6 that the problem was related to the arbitration process that must be quickly concluded.
SC wasted this special leave request with a request to a high court to take the earliest problem.
Cases listed to hear: broadcast moving SC
