PANAJI: The High Court while rejecting the petition that challenges non-tourist limits entering the casino in Goa, held that the sidewalk of the state government “is justified for advanced reasons by the state of Goa”.
“It is the public interest of the cave residents so as well as for the sake of the state for justifications .
The court argues that the object of state naturally to prevent people domiciled in Goa is seen as a game of opportunity like that and causes their families to suffer poverty and mental trauma.
The classification of people as domiciled in Goa and tourist licenses was established well, “the division bench consisting of Hakeses Mahesh Sonak and MS Jawalkar.” The classification between tourists who came to Goa for several days to entertain themselves and locals Domiciled in Goa is based on understood Differentia, “said the court.
Advocacy General Devidas Pangam stated that being a welfare state, he also had to see that young people were protected and not too torn up or addicted to the activity involved opportunities or luck.
In the absence of restrictions, people -People in Goa can suffer poverty, which will ultimately inhibit the economic and social development of the country where families of the people are also asked to suffer financial losses.
“Tourists come to Goa for a short period of time and relaxation and limited access opportunities.
However, if people who live in Goa are permitted, it may have a bad effect on the community, “said Pamam.
Petitions submitted by Legal Students in the past year Shukr Usgaonkar challenges the provisions of the gambling law that makes it a violation for non-tourists to take part in gambling activities.