Mumbai: Referring to the observation of the Supreme Court that former Minister of Houses of State of Deshmukh and Police Commissioner Mumbai Param Beer worked in close confidence, the Bombay High Court on Wednesday asked the CBI if the probe was based on Sachin Waze as a police commissioner assistant last year.
The committee recovered Waze was led by Police Commissioner Mumbai Param Bir Singh.
Judge SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar said, “Anyone who is the head of administration at the relevant time cannot claim the helplessness.
It is equally assigned the officer to prevent it at the relevant time.” HC heard the tired petition submitted by Dishmukh Fir which submitted it and “Unknown Person ‘by the CBI on April 21 under the prevention of the Corruption Law (PCA) for improper profits.
HC in verbal exchanges, with additional lawyers General Safe Lekhi for CBI, during hearing, said, “What we expected from the CBI, as usual, is that broad-based investigations as you say and that all responsible people will be ordered.
‘ ‘Lekhi said, “The investigation will be broad-based and includes everyone.
But for that, the investigation must continue.
HC said it had passed no temporary commandment for the probe term so far.
Lekhi said the probe developed and was not detained in any way.
He said the government could not be as an organized syndicate.
He also said it was a “multi-layer complex investigation ‘.
CBI” traced the trend’ and that “no exception will be made for anyone.” “He added,” It’s not as if the agency will play favorites.
“” But he said Order April 5 HC for Introduction The investigation empowers the CBI to investigate the allegations against Deshmukh.
Lekhi said given that the public involved “the investigation body moves with wisdom, but also does not jump in any way.” “If the Petitioner anticipates the cost sheet, there is a feeling of guilt, ” said Lekhi said that he would not, he had to be open to let Probe continues.
He also said that FIR was not expected to give all the details and attachments for FIR, it must also be taken into account, in this case, a letter by Param Singh to CM and complaint of Advocate of Jaishri Patil to Police Hill Malabar Station, quoted the letter, accused Deshmukh instructed Waze for Collect Rs 100 Crore per Month from restaurants and bars and other sources Amit Deshai, senior advisors for Deshmukh in the argument of their conclusions on Wednesday, “FIR does not have an average.
The fact to suggest that the Deshmukh committee is offended, it also does not have flat -Rata that he received money.
“He added that even on June 11 in a written statement in HC, CBI never said that Dishmukh received money, not a single money, not a rupee, it only accused” efforts’ and alleged transfer and Post with an undue influence but without any alleged extortion.
Desai argues that the entire param beer singh “motivated because of its transfer on March 17” and “contains false accusations.
‘” Deshai argues that Dishmukh resigned on “moral land”.
Lehki said, Desthmukh’s determination “Petitions truly considered’ ‘.
He said, “The court must see the fact when they stand.
We do not need to look only on fir but also on the material that accompanies it and the progress of the investigation.” The trial will now continue on Monday.
CBI Counsel for HC: Dishmukh dismissal petition is not worn at all
